My point is Kane is the more versatile player because of this he filled the void of not having classic 10 in the squad (Lallana would have played that role had he been fit), also in midfield we lacked a creative player in a double pivot, the player next to the DM, a player who dictates play from a deeper position (Winks/Dembele also Eriksen does this to great effect for us).
England were without these two type of players and Kane was seen as the best compromise to this (laid bare in yesterday's game) and in the other games he shared this role with Sterling with both of them alternating during a game, both however with slight differences around their strengths and weakness in terms of running/sprinting, but for simplicity sake in previous games in the tournament they took turns to drop into the hole while one went more advanced.
The issue wasn't up top, it was in midfield. This was what we were missing and in the absence of a player to fill these spaces we used mainly Kane but Sterling too.
Mate, you're re-enforcing a lot that i've already acknowledged in prev posts on the subject of Sterling (& Kane).
Regardless of what we don't have in our talent pool - it is what it is - we pressumably set up the way we did to compensate and the prevailing question remains...
Would you stick with Sterling ahead of Kane moving fwd?
Or would you prefer, like me, to see him as the focal point of our attack and furthermore, as our best player, set up to seek to get the most out of him...?
I've already said, i don't think GS could have got much more out of the collective so this is not an outright criticism, but nonetheless one of the quandries we face post-WC.
The other; We need 2 of Dele, Sterling, Rashdord & Lingard to step up and own a position otherwise we're doomed to spend the next 4 years chopping and changing like we used to CMs during the 'Golden Gen'.
Beyond....
Pickford's staked his claim and he's still just a kid..
I think we'll see another CB step up alongside Stones & HMcG and thus shift Walker back solely into the RB pool (will he struggle against the superior product of Trips and TAA..? Also, noting KWP is a world cup winner at his age and Trips's age, this will be intriguing over the coming years whilst we look set in the long term).
Young's inclusion was a case of circumstance (Rose & Utd.). Also factoring in AYs age, DR will be back to duking it out with Bertrand for LB and pressumably prevail if he get's his club game back on track.
Vardy, Welbeck, Cahill, Hart also done.
Lots to sort out b4 Euro20... I hope we don't piss away most of our opportunity to address it being 'experimental' with Harry Kane.