I was merely referring to Eriksen at his worst but I think your post highlights exceptionally well why stats and the use of shouldn't be taken too seriously (not a dig at you btw).
What the above doesn't take into consideration is Eriksen playing a deeper role this season in which a lot of his passing is 5 yards to the left or right, keeping the ball moving. In previous seasons his passes would've been further up the pitch in more dangerous areas. I would hazard a guess that his final third pass completion % is actually lower this season. In my opinion anyone can sit in the middle of the park and hit 5-10 yard passes forwards, backwards or sideways. A Nabil Bentaleb if you like.
If we're going to discuss Eriksen's tackling, my argument would be that I have seen, with my own eyes, many, many occasions where he has dangled a floppy leg out near our box and made almost no attempt to prevent the player from going past him. Until recently, I'd never seen him booked for a foul that I could remember; he would always let players glide past him, even on the half way line, when on the counter. There has been a couple of cynical fouls in him recently, which is good to see, but another thing the stats wouldn't take into consideration is where on the pitch is he making tackles?
Kane's injury vs Man City, didn't need to challenge Delph there. The stat would say successful tackle if he wins the ball but ultimately the benefit to the team is minimal. What I do see though is Eriksen not getting stuck in where it matters for Burnley's goal. I remember him heading the ball 25 yards from our goal towards our own corner flag recently, was that Burnley or someone else? Can't remember but I think a goal or a big chance came from it. Very nearly cost us our CL campaign at the death with one of the sloppiest balls I've ever seen.
Stats are pointless without context and my argument is based on events we've all seen happen over the course of the season.