Pointless stats?Yes its awkward because you're bringing out pointless stats despite you claiming you hate pointless stats (labelling assist stats as that lol).
"In the 90 minute so and so played" give me a break man. It could be many factors why we won those games. How about you actually carry on claiming stats are deceiving OR give us individual performance stats of Dier. One or the other but quit being a fucking hypocrite.
Like winning more games and losing less games when we deploy a DM as opposed to when we don’t?
What factors?
So many factors but you’ve named zero. Funny how these nameless factors keep repeating themselves nearly every time Dier plays a full game eh.
Maybe there were magical other factors as to why Dele scored a few tap ins against Watford and Norwich but that doesn’t need looking at either does it......
You’ve all tried and all failed to find a comprehensive argument as to why our results with Dier, our only viable DM, trounce our results when he doesn’t play.
You’ve all cried for a DM, but somehow in your heads we are better off without one despite the figures utterly suggesting otherwise.
Again, if the stats were the polar opposite, would you dismiss them and claim it had nothing to do with Eric Dier?
If the stats for games won and lost were in favour for Dele, would you use them?
When I post stats for games won people say “what about the 28 minutes he was taken off and we won”. And bang on about ONE game in THIRTEEN.
When I post the P4 W4 L0 he played in the PL over 90 minutes, suddenly that’s irrelevant too.
Absolute shambles some of you lot are.