I already said I disagree but you've ignored it.As in discuss the point being put to you..... That it's wrong of him to conduct his business IN THE TABLOID MEDIA (specifically).
You say you're not ignoring it, but look back at your last 4/5 posts?
You implied I was by bringing up the discussion we had about CE in the summer.Did I call you naive?
Did I question whether DR or CE were being honest?
Did I mention him leaving on a free?
Nope.
You're obviously posting in defense of him, yet your defense sidesteps the very factor that has people riled.
You even mention all the 'second chances' he's been given as if that somehow negates people's ire when in fact it JUSTIFIES it all the more.
He spoke in the paper some people are angry, some people are not. What else is there to add?