You sure that's related to the abdominal muscle?
I suppose it depends on how much you have to strain
Didn’t a ManU midfielder have something similar a few years ago?
The Fighting Cock is a forum for fans of Tottenham Hotspur Football Club. Here you can discuss Spurs latest matches, our squad, tactics and any transfer news surrounding the club. Registration gives you access to all our forums (including 'Off Topic' discussion) and removes most of the adverts (you can remove them all via an account upgrade). You're here now, you might as well...
You sure that's related to the abdominal muscle?
I suppose it depends on how much you have to strain
Didn’t a ManU midfielder have something similar a few years ago?
Not that his agent is so keen in reassuring Spurs fans, just so happens it does.
I suppose it depends on how much you have to strain
Didn’t a ManU midfielder have something similar a few years ago?
If Fletcher completely different. His was an intestinal issue which was hugely debilitating and very serious.
Whilst as a club we have form for 'small' issues becoming lengthy absences, there is nothing as yet to suggest Eriksen's problem is one that will keep him out of action for too long.
Famous last words hopefully do not spring to mind.
Someone in this thread said Eriksen could potentially have ulcerative colitis - which is what Fletcher had.
But that was when the issue was potentially chronic, but abdominal pain is a symptom.
I believe its been cleared up that it isn't chronic though so highly likely he doesn't have that and probably just tore a muscle in his belly.
I think he'll sign, is apparently very settled in London.
Chelsea it is then.
Chelsea it is then.
I love Kane, it's great to have an all-English out-and-out Yid up front, but in all honesty Eriksen is pound-for-pound our best player.
We should negotiate hard, but at the end, pay what we need to pay to keep him. Because replacing him like-for-like will cost a boat-load more.
Rumours today in Denmark is that his agent demanded 200k/w.
That's another departure, then
Svend Larsen and mojo
I respect people right to disagree with my views. But I'd appreciate some argumentation or pointing out with what do you guys disagree?
For example to me it is clear- Harry Kane is best striker in EPL.
And Eriksen is not best playmaker in EPL.
We are a totally different team without Eriksen. It's not just his ability, it's his workrate.
When Son replaces Kane, we're inferior. When Eriksen doesn't play, we are *much* worse.
It's pretty close, but I'll stick with my assessment: Eriksen is our best player and the most irreplaceable. You talk about better AMs in the prem...debatable, but even if so: which one is a feasible signing? I'd suggest none.
Does it occur to you that Kane is "the best striker in the EPL" precisely because he's playing in front of Eriksen ...
Who has said that he is not best for Spurs? Of course he is.So is Eriksen the best playmaker in the world? maybe not ... but is he the best for Spurs? ... I would say 100% yes ....
Rumours today in Denmark is that his agent demanded 200k/w.
That's another departure, then