I would welcome oil money.
The Fighting Cock is a forum for fans of Tottenham Hotspur Football Club. Here you can discuss Spurs latest matches, our squad, tactics and any transfer news surrounding the club. Registration gives you access to all our forums (including 'Off Topic' discussion) and removes most of the adverts (you can remove them all via an account upgrade). You're here now, you might as well...
While we are on the subject of Russian billionaires...
Woolwich’s Alisher Usmanov loses $809m in 48 hours, Chelsea’s Roman Abramovich loses $449.5m
Two of the wealthiest men involved in Premier League football have lost a fortune in the past 48 hours, reports Vanity Fair.
In news that will send chills down the spines of Woolwich and Chelsea supporters, Alisher Usmanov and Roman Abramovich have seen their wealth decimated in the last two days as the Russian economy had nosedived.
As Russia ruble has fallen to its lowest value in more than a decade, Chelsea owner Abramovich has reportedly lost $449.5 million. That has left Roman with a net worth of just $12.8 billion.
As for Woolwich’s second largest shareholder Usmanov, he has lost $809 million this week, leaving his net worth at $13.4 billion.
The figures were compiled using data from Bloomberg’s Billionaires index.
Stadium ...وايت هارت لينFC هوتسبر توتنهام
It could for someone yes. I actually feel rather positive about Spurs, especially if we don't get bought and stick to the long-term plan. It'll take a while, but the club would become very stable contenders.The scary thing is that if the Qataris want to buy a club, they're going to buy one. What if it's NOT us? This could end very badly.
:chadliwtf:
I don't want anything to do with their regime in the slightest to be honest. Their attitude to women, miniorities, human rights and the climate is appalling. I would seriously consider supporting another club if they bought us out.
One obvious target is West Ham. Then we'll quite likely end up as London's fourth club, within 10-20 years.
I don't want anything to do with their regime in the slightest to be honest. Their attitude to women, miniorities, human rights and the climate is appalling. I would seriously consider supporting another club if they bought us out.
Maybe. Then Woolwich would be even further in front of us. But I'd rather that than us fall to fourth London club behind West Ham as well.The more obvious target is Woolwich, IMO.
There goes the fucking holiday!!!!!Down to their last €10 billion now I expect, poor sods.
They would change the name. West Goat? West Lamb?
Exactly. Realistically, the only way we can challenge the Big Five is to get new owners in. The new stadium might do it, but I'd far rather it was built by people with serious money to spend on the club.I just want to see us be a powerhouse, I couldn't give a shit how it happens. I'm sick of finishing outside of our goals every season and I'm sick of finishing beneath those pigs down the road. Show me the money!
Are we there yet ?
I despise West Ham more than Woolwich and almost as much as Cheatski. I blame the 90's for that hate. Sugar made us almost their rivals !
However, The quality of West Ham's PR is amazing , Look at those great marketing pictures of the Olympic Stadium with all that Claret and Blue and statutes of Spurs wannabe Bobby Moore and you would think wow what a result.
However, those knuckle draggers need to wake up and realise what is going. The Stadium is leased to them only 25 match days per year. When not in use by West Ham the "branding" is not allowed. It's not their "home"
There is no agreement for statues of Bobby Moore / Bobby Barnes or Phil Parkes allowed in or around the stadium.
All that Claret and blue must be taken away on non match days. there is no museum allowed to showcase the times when they came 5th and went up via playoffs.
Nor is anyone being honest about the retractable seats nonsense, the other views being a joke due to the athletic legacy bullshit ( look at the Barcelona Olympic Stadium debacle for how bad these stadiums are for football ) + there are some great aerial shots showing that The Boylen Ground completely fits inside the track area of the Olympic Stadium.
Oh and the 54000 revenue is 50000 maximum paying customers as Newham have 4000 "free" tickets for Newham council staff guaranteed each and every match day for years to come - good luck with high pricing on tickets when a fair chunk are free !
And the remaining revenue is not 100% West Ham's as they have to share a % of that with it Newham also. Nor can they get 100% of the naming rights nor can they ( I think ) collect all the corporate revenue, they might get 100% of the pork scratching sales. So might be able to afford a % of Fat Sam's compensation payment.
The Upton Park sale is less than expected & given they must be debt free to move ( without penalty ) they are not getting near the top table anytime soon as the revenue stream is so low they can't buy their way anywhere.
West Ham have been asset striped, but have managed to get their idiot fans to smile about it, better than Turkey's voting for Christmas. ENIC saw this bollocks and went with a proposal that did not cover over the cracks. Those with less honesty sold out their club and fans.
But let's not let facts get in the way of a good story "plucky old West Ham......potential Champions of Europe when the Middle East save the day". They are move Coventry City than Manchester City and although it's frightening to think of them doing "reasonable well" I think we can sleep easy for a few generations yet.
Shame they did not go bust under the Icelanders :-(
I think what it means is that we'd like to do business with them in the future without bad blood. I don't think it's referring to a Real style "special relationship".Since when the fuck have we had a relationship with PSG :kaboullol:
i know but
"According to the weekly publication, Tottenham did not want to hinder their relationship with PSG President Nasser Al Khelaifi"
Just seems like such an odd, out of the blue thing to say.