Arabs buying clubs is old news, it's the Chinese that are doing all the buying recently...
That's even worse... Oh and racist..
The Fighting Cock is a forum for fans of Tottenham Hotspur Football Club. Here you can discuss Spurs latest matches, our squad, tactics and any transfer news surrounding the club. Registration gives you access to all our forums (including 'Off Topic' discussion) and removes most of the adverts (you can remove them all via an account upgrade). You're here now, you might as well...
Arabs buying clubs is old news, it's the Chinese that are doing all the buying recently...
I think you'd find the same arguments used if the new breed of owner were 80s yuppies who come into football clueless as well.Its not racism,just football fans sad to see THEIR game going the way it is.And the shit about foreign owners is embarrassing, xenophobic and bordering on racist.
ExactlyIn other words, the old ticket exchange....
Maybe I'm just a sentimental old fool but I still think it's morally wrong for one Spurs supporter to rip off another Spurs supporter.
Have you got your mirror shades with you?Not a sentimental old fool Mrs P, you're what is known in the trade as a proper Spurs fan..
Have you got your mirror shades with you?
Private joke? as I don't get itHave you got your mirror shades with you?
Yes, private joke Mrs P. I won't go into detail.Private joke? as I don't get it
This is exactly the problem - they feed off people's desperate need to get to see a game, especially as this is the last season at WHL and there will be lots of people trying to make a 'pilgrimage'. It's just not right. Hope you and your friend enjoy the game.Tottenham v Sunderland will be my first game at the Lane. Probably also the last, but atleast I'm going to get to see it once.
Had to buy tickets for ~90€ each, because I'm going to visit the game with a non-member friend. Which means there isn't even a possibility for me to buy tickets otherwise. Yes, I know I can get tickets for face value on Twitter, but I can't risk not getting two tickets.
StubHub is shit, but the only way for foreign supporters to visit a match. Just don't understand why they had to make a business out of this too.
I hope you enjoy it but surely you could have tried on here first? Not like your some random member who registered to ask for ticketsTottenham v Sunderland will be my first game at the Lane. Probably also the last, but atleast I'm going to get to see it once.
Had to buy tickets for ~90€ each, because I'm going to visit the game with a non-member friend. Which means there isn't even a possibility for me to buy tickets otherwise. Yes, I know I can get tickets for face value on Twitter, but I can't risk not getting two tickets.
StubHub is shit, but the only way for foreign supporters to visit a match. Just don't understand why they had to make a business out of this too.
benjomess weird disagree
Good. You're learning.But I tell you what, next time I can't make a game on my season ticket, I'll spend the £100 or so quid I usually spend getting there, stand outside with a questionnaire, making sure the bloke who gets my ticket has been a Spurs fan for 60 years, sings himself hoarse for 90 minutes every game, him, his dad, his grandfather and his great grandfather are all good honest working class fuckers who have always lived in council flats in Enfield, and I'll pay him 50 quid to take the ticket off me. Because buying a season ticket for Spurs for years means I'm now responsible for them.
Not really, because revenue from match tickets is a very small percentage of overall income for the clubs. And it's easy enough to have a cap whereby all teams are on the same page; they've done it for away tickets, as of this season the most you'll pay for an away ticket is £30. They could easily all decide to make sure, for example, that the most you'd pay for a home match ticket behind either goal is £30, and the most a season ticket in that area can cost would be £600, and still charge more for corporates and the side stands.I really agree with your sentiment at its core, I really do. But I don't think stubhub and the "business" side of it is solely to blame. To a degree, I think supporters themselves are liable as well - supporters demand success. Transfer thread is always full (less so with the with recent market successes) of people calling for the club to "do what is necessary" or "stop pinching pennies" to buy/sign the players required to win. It's a spiral. United got minted off Fergie's success, and in order to compete other clubs had to come up with ways to generate cash flow. At the end of the day, the best possible source of revenue are the supporters (particularly when you haven't been massively successful but want to be).
It would be detestable if ENIC were pocketing the cash, but at the least for Spurs is clear that everything going into the club is being managed very well and reinvested into the club. Obviously there's loads of factors, but the demand of success fuels the requirement to continually increase revenue year after year. The only way to change that, really, would be hard caps on spending and revenue/profits putting a ceiling on the clubs' financial layout to reduce the need for supporter revenue. But that's like getting the F1 paddock to agree a speed limit.
Not really, because revenue from match tickets is a very small percentage of overall income for the clubs. And it's easy enough to have a cap whereby all teams are on the same page; they've done it for away tickets, as of this season the most you'll pay for an away ticket is £30. They could easily all decide to make sure, for example, that the most you'd pay for a home match ticket behind either goal is £30, and the most a season ticket in that area can cost would be £600, and still charge more for corporates and the side stands.
A few months ago I would have said it could never happen, but I was then completely shocked when the £30 away ticket cap was agreed to. I never thought that would happen. That, to me, is the best thing that has happened for football fans in recent years. Before that, away tickets were getting out of control, Woolwich/Chelsea were charging nearly £70, it would not have been long before you would have been paying £100. This season Woolwich will be £26 instead of £64. Over the whole season this will save me a lot of money.I'd love to see something of that sort, it'd be amazing for supporters. I think it'd be difficult to push through, I imagine. Maybe if there was a concerted effort to put a similar scheme in place in the Football League (where prices are obviously more reasonable anyway, but at least set the precedent and establish some useful data), then push for the PL. I think the biggest issue with the PL is, outside of Levy, how many chairmen at the PL clubs have a connection to their club, or any club in general, before taking their post. They're businessmen looking at pounds with little to no experience from the supporters' perspective.
and they won't charge as much for a standing ticket.
Tottenham Hotspur Supporters Trust & 'Stop Stubhub' Group release a joint statement on the Stubhub resale facility.
Continue reading...