Certainly it is true. He realised what he’d said and tried to cover it with more blather.Sadly missed it- too busy shouting ‘Noooo’.
if true, shouldn’t be allowed.
The Fighting Cock is a forum for fans of Tottenham Hotspur Football Club. Here you can discuss Spurs latest matches, our squad, tactics and any transfer news surrounding the club. Registration gives you access to all our forums (including 'Off Topic' discussion) and removes most of the adverts (you can remove them all via an account upgrade). You're here now, you might as well...
Certainly it is true. He realised what he’d said and tried to cover it with more blather.Sadly missed it- too busy shouting ‘Noooo’.
if true, shouldn’t be allowed.
Gonna have to agree to disagree there mate. Either way it was at minimum an absolute yellow that wan't even given as a foul......Then it should qualify as dangerous under the premise that he wasn't in control.
Intent needn't come into it.
No replay I've seen shows it as below the ankle.
What a wanker.Certainly it is true. He realised what he’d said and tried to cover it with more blather.
Even BBC text we’re surprised he didn’t get any repercussion. (Perhaps the lack of on-field reaction means it gets dealt with retrospectively?)Gonna have to agree to disagree there mate. Either way it was at minimum an absolute yellow that wan't even given as a foul.
Same as the PEA earlier today that was reviewed by VAR and a straight red given.
And that's where VAR and the FA really needs to sort it's shit out. Retrospective cards and discipline for diving and shit like this (so we don't have to add even more delays to the game).Even BBC text we’re surprised he didn’t get any repercussion. (Perhaps the lack of on-field reaction means it gets dealt with retrospectively?)
it won’t, because they’re the new best-team-ever
Yes, we resorted to disappointing tactics, but we were forced to through circumstance. I think it will do the players’ mentality the world of good: massively depleted with important players missing physically (Hugo, Harry, Moussa, Ben, Tanguy) or spiritually (Eriksen) - but we still came off better than those teams much higher up the table.Can’t fault the tactics - though at same time don’t like it.
thought most ran their socks off for the club today. Congrats Tanganga - May it be the first of many; Aurier good; Gazza good saves; Dav & Toby solid; Winks ran himself into the ground and found some forward passes; Lucas the same. GLC good when he came on. Coco ran around a lot. Thought Sonny had a slightly off game. Not sure if it was Dele or is brother that showed up tonight. Rose a joke. Erikssen as disgrace - sellhim or drop him please.
such a shame and pity to see my club/our club resort to these tactics and this performance. How we have fallen.
Liverpool in 2nd gear most of the game...
It’s even made the papers! How did I miss that?Certainly it is true. He realised what he’d said and tried to cover it with more blather.
Fucking hell how much of a bore fest was that? Does anyone who believes it want to say we still look a better team without Kane?
Feeble finishing lost us that, against a reallly poor Liverpool team as well. Lucas, Son, Lo Celso, Dele, Lamela weak as piss with their shooting.
I expected a defeat but Christ have a bit of heart Spurs, have some guts and have a proper scrap for the money you earn. It seems we really do need a revamp, we massively lacked hunger and teeth tonight not Lucas and Tanganga come out of it with any credibility IMO.
A la UnitedI think League leaders have always got away with shit.
I think we have maybe a better chance of catching them than Chelsea.Leicester have nothing to do with our season so their results don't matter. Do you seriously think we are catching them??
And better still in the second, especially after Lamela and Lo Celso came on.aint bad. I thought he played well in the first half
And we can't do that. Infrastructure first unfortunately. I believe this is correct provided that it improves our spending power in the market. Not this month, but the next two windows.They then went and bought two players in the places they REALLY needed them (£66M goalkeeper and a £75M centreback) - we signed no one for 18 months. That my friends is the crux of the matter
Yes, and in those days, the fear was Ferguson. Question him and you would be exluded from the pressers which was a death knell in the pre-internet era.A la United
But in that "best player" thread from a while ago, I was reliably informed by some fans that Son could replace Kane's role like-for-like with essentially no drop-off. A few even ventured that Son would statistically outperform Kane in a CF role.Does anyone who believes it want to say we still look a better team without Kane?
Sky were awful post game. Really did not make any attempt to hide their bias.Probably won’t even get mentioned on MOTD - did anyone struggle through the Sky after match? Did they discuss how lucky he was to still be on the pitch?
oh, and did anyone notice how TAA (best RB in world (TM)) was pretty invisible?
Compare that challenge to Serge’s at Anfield....Gonna have to agree to disagree there mate. Either way it was at minimum an absolute yellow that wan't even given as a foul.
That’s why I turn it off: normally do even if we win, but I’d already had the misfortune to watch a few minutes of the pre-match nonsense so it sounds like it was as I suspected.Sky were awful post game. Really did not make any attempt to hide their bias.