Most people in the top of their respective fields would know - most top traders would know, most top University Lecturers would know etc.Most people have no idea what their equivalents at other companies earn.
The Fighting Cock is a forum for fans of Tottenham Hotspur Football Club. Here you can discuss Spurs latest matches, our squad, tactics and any transfer news surrounding the club. Registration gives you access to all our forums (including 'Off Topic' discussion) and removes most of the adverts (you can remove them all via an account upgrade). You're here now, you might as well...
Most people in the top of their respective fields would know - most top traders would know, most top University Lecturers would know etc.Most people have no idea what their equivalents at other companies earn.
Ha, you always resort to this shit.Na mate we don't need to rework our wage structure, don't you know. We'll just buy players from the lower leagues and pay them minimum wage, the propah way
And he signed a contract at the end of that period. If he ''knows what he's worth'' and was being exploited, why did he sign it?His timing was stupid for many reasons but the injury was one of them.. but that aside- he was the best LB in the league for 2 years in a row. In fact the best fullback period in the league and one of the best in Europe.
Because the wage structure has nothing to do with how well the players work on the pitch. I think most people can agree that there are players out there earning ludicrous money who are actually quite shite.
But that in itself causes a conundrum. I don't blame Tottenham players for looking at the results they achieve contra the money they make and going "wonder why I make less than X over at club Y despite doing a better job at the end of the day? Gotta talk with the boss about that".
Most players are mature human beings and handle such things like adults, by talking with their managers, or the managing staff themselves see that players a performing well and reward them with new improved deals. Just look at how many we dished out last season.
I won't throw shit at Alderweireld for wanting to set up the best possible new deal he can get with Tottenham. He has a long term contract so as long as he and the club handles this professionally I have no problem with negotiations taking a while.
What I have a problem with is people seemingly throwing him under the bus for apparently wanting an improved deal when he signs one.
I’d love that to be the case, but it’s nit that realistic. Let’s say you could have a comfortable life on £50k per annum, but get paid £75k per annum. Great so far.You are welcome to your views but I'm of the opinion that any footballer not satisfied with £300,000 a month needs to take a look at themselves.
If I'm happy, I'm happy.I’d love that to be the case, but it’s nit that realistic. Let’s say you could have a comfortable life on £50k per annum, but get paid £75k per annum. Great so far.
The guy at the desk next to you isn’t as good at this job, but gets £150k per annum. Don’t you want parity? Maybe not, but I’d suggest you’d be in the minority.
You are welcome to your views but I'm of the opinion that any footballer not satisfied with £300,000 a month needs to take a look at themselves.
This. People who expect ridiculous wage increases are out on a wild bikeride somewhere. We'll advance our salary structure to take us onto the level of Liverpool and Woolwich.Agreed. However, football is a bubble that doesn't really intersect with the real world.
I would also add that although i have little doubt that we'll revisit our wage structure in the next 1-2 years, i very much doubt that the kind of increase we can offer will be enough to compete with those above us in the 'wages league'. It will bring us closer, but anyone thinking that we'll suddenly be able to offer £200k a week to players, i feel will be sadly disappointed.
I remember reading that the new stadium will be worth about an extra £30 million in gate receipts a year. That's probably worth an extra £20k a week across the squad. Sure, we'd pay our best more, but that then starts wage inflation and the squad players will want a piece of the action. So basically, £30k a week for our best and a £10k rise for everyone else is probably nearer the mark if those gate receipt figures are correct.
Obviously increased income from sponsorship and the money from the NFL might raise that figure somewhat too.
Long story short, i don't think the new stadium is going to make us Man City or Real Madrid in the wages stakes.
I imagine as our revenue increases, wages will follow, it has in the past no reason to assume it wont in the future. What's clear is the long-term stability of the club wont be put at risk by player demands. If they want more money and it's on the table at another club then not a lot we can do. It will be a house of cards once we cave for one.
I believe the in the next ten years several clubs who are either in the top flight now, or recently will disappear into obscurity. Broadcast is near saturation and as the World's economies shrink people wont want to fork out the money for sport, subscription numbers will drop and so will the money bid for the games. Some clubs will be so reliant on these revenue streams they will be fucked not being able to cover their running costs.
or
Players will be earning £1m a week
It's definitely approaching the limit but I reckon there are one or two mega deals left broadcast-wise seen as it is rumoured Amazon fancy having a crack at getting the rights next time.
Eventually though the bubble will burst when people stop wanting to pay the subscription fees that become more about paying for football than tv shows. Anyone tech-savvy can get to watch pretty much anything they fancy for free and it's only going to get easier...
I don't sympathize with any of them.
Pay him what he's worth? Relatively speaking you say?
Ok, let's see.......kicking a ball around for 90 minutes a week.
Relatively speaking, he's lucky to get a tenner a week for that
It's their trade; this is another tiresome 'footballers are overpaid' rant that really does need to be addressed.
Do soldiers or doctors deserve more? No. They chose those careers, knowing the circa salary and workload. They could have pursued a career 'kicking a ball about for 90 minutes'....
The reality is it's a lot easier to become a doctor or a soldier than a Tottenham footballer, and the rewards are there for those capable enough to do so.
Public Sector workers seemingly resent the rest of the world, but if they're really dismayed with the salaries and (perceived lack of) perks affiliated with their chosen careers, they're free to seek private/alternate employment.
A Premier League footballer on average probably contributes more in tax and NI deductions per week than a nurse or primary teacher does in 10 years; these fellas are a huge economic asset to the country.
And mark my words, greed will save Teldar Paper, as well as that other malfunctioning organization, the United States of America!Im not slagging off Toby, I think people need to just look at it for what it is. Greed is normal.....Im greedy, and Im sure you are too. Its human nature, it happens, it can be justified and excused. But its still greed.
Wrap it up in all the Lillywhite cotton you like, anyone who thinks playing football is not rewarded enough with a 75k a week wage is being greedy.
If Ronaldo and Messi were earning 20k a week, Im pretty sure Toby would be enjoying the highlife on 8k a week.
Its greedy, no matter what spin you put on it. He's paid a kings ransom to do, in the cold light of things, fuck all.
Im not slagging off Toby, I think people need to just look at it for what it is. Greed is normal.....Im greedy, and Im sure you are too. Its human nature, it happens, it can be justified and excused. But its still greed.