...all everyone was interested in was £££££...
Who'd have thunk it eh?
The Fighting Cock is a forum for fans of Tottenham Hotspur Football Club. Here you can discuss Spurs latest matches, our squad, tactics and any transfer news surrounding the club. Registration gives you access to all our forums (including 'Off Topic' discussion) and removes most of the adverts (you can remove them all via an account upgrade). You're here now, you might as well...
...all everyone was interested in was £££££...
Edit: interesting comment posted on that article...
As a senior project quality control manager who has managed some of the worlds most prestigious projects, i walked away from this project after just 6 weeks because of the following
1. The job was being run by non managerial staff brought in by Base construction on behalf of Daniel Levy.
2. Fire safety was being ignored on closures.
3. Agencies were sending Romanian post men disguised as construction men.
4. Leadership from Directors down didnt want experienced men. They wanted shouters and people who would put in the hours regardless what they could do.
I approached the top people with photos and a list of why this would fail and they didnt give a hoot.
I wrote to agency concerned and all everyone was interested in was £££££ not the project.
I am now on a similar project which is on the same route.
Something has to be done soon or the consequences will be grave.
I am interested in helping sort this out if anyone is willing to listen
This is what we get for hiring Spammers
I tend to agree with this line as if you click on the link now you can only read it if you subscribe to Construction News, er....No thanks!
I've read the comments following it's posting, and I guessing the article says the site resembles something like this.....
Notice the golden cockeral at the top.
Not necessarily, just because something isn't a critical path item doesn't mean it can't be worked on as long as it isn't impeding the critical path tasks. Could be a different trade, different contractor, or even the same contractor currently with a manpower surplus due to being halted on a more important task for some reason.
Testing the video wall in West Main Entrance foyer.
Testing the cylindrical screen in Tottenham Experience
All tends to suggest the 'Safety Systems' electrical work is well under way or ven close to completion if 'non essential' things are being worked on - don't think the Tottenham Experience was due to open until 2019 so the cylindrical screen is a long way off the critical path.
Not necessarily, just because something isn't a critical path item doesn't mean it can't be worked on as long as it isn't impeding the critical path tasks. Could be a different trade, different contractor, or even the same contractor currently with a manpower surplus due to being halted on a more important task for some reason.
In general it's more expensive/time consuming to send your manpower away and bring it back, so if you're only held up for a few days or even weeks it could be more beneficial just to find that labor something else to do in the meantime.
Not saying you're wrong, just that this is yet another reason why it's entirely impossible to stand on a street corner (like many have been doing for the past year) and make declarations of how the project is going and who knows what.
Edit: interesting comment posted on that article...
As a senior project quality control manager who has managed some of the worlds most prestigious projects, i walked away from this project after just 6 weeks because of the following
1. The job was being run by non managerial staff brought in by Base construction on behalf of Daniel Levy.
2. Fire safety was being ignored on closures.
3. Agencies were sending Romanian post men disguised as construction men.
4. Leadership from Directors down didnt want experienced men. They wanted shouters and people who would put in the hours regardless what they could do.
I approached the top people with photos and a list of why this would fail and they didnt give a hoot.
I wrote to agency concerned and all everyone was interested in was £££££ not the project.
I am now on a similar project which is on the same route.
Something has to be done soon or the consequences will be grave.
I am interested in helping sort this out if anyone is willing to listen
yeah..people involved in a construction project, an industry notorious for overrunning and going over budget, worried about the costs.Who'd have thunk it eh?
Why is Bob wearing his Arse where his Nads should be ?
that explains the great "bob the builder" fancy dress shortage of 2018
he's really a romanian postman. how would he know that?Why is Bob wearing his Arse where his Nads should be ?
Fair point actually, until I read that CN article I assumed Mace were in full control. Which as it's late would be liable for LAD's liquidated asset damages, which is ultimately late fees. I'm not sure what leeway the club woukd have to charge made in the instance. But I'm not a QS and am only speculating.Does that not fuck up any penalty clauses for failures etc? I mean, if MACE have no control over anything then how can they be fully held to account when things go tits up?
If this is the case, then why would they take those risks (other than possibly to shave a few quid off the bill)
I mean the article says it perfectly, Mace are like a lion without teeth or claws. Like a pointless middle man and I can only assume we're appointed for their expertise. Although, by half ass hiring them the club have stifled their effectiveness. In my opinion. Will be interesting to see the fallout.But Mace's power comes from being able to tell the sub contractor that they are appointed by Spurs to oversee/manage the project so if the sub contractor is failing to carry out the contract then Spurs will penalise them to the extent that the contract allows.
The sub contractor also knows, given Mace are a big company, that they may be placing in jeopardy future work where Mace are involved - which the subby would know is not a good idea
Also to answer the last part, I actually don't know. I assume it's a control thing as financially it makes no sense as the risk would outweigh any gains.Does that not fuck up any penalty clauses for failures etc? I mean, if MACE have no control over anything then how can they be fully held to account when things go tits up?
If this is the case, then why would they take those risks (other than possibly to shave a few quid off the bill)
Personally, I love the all navy blue look, I think it's very classy.Anyone else think the club should have tried adding white seats to make the badge and club name we are seeing on this image? Tricky to do but if you can pull it off I think it would have looked fantastic
Personally, I love the all navy blue look, I think it's very classy.
I mean the article says it perfectly, Mace are like a lion without teeth or claws. Like a pointless middle man and I can only assume we're appointed for their expertise. Although, by half ass hiring them the club have stifled their effectiveness. In my opinion. Will be interesting to see the fallout.
The arrangement that's been reported, however, isn't really unusual (at least in my experience when I was still working for a GC/CM. The GC/CM often is forced to take on sub-contractors that they haven't directly chosen and whose draw might not be taken directly from the GC/CM. Two instances that immediately jump to my mind are working for Target, who had preferred subcontractors they mandated and therefore weren't entirely beholden to the GC/CM and when I worked on the basketball arena in Memphis which was funded largely by federal and state money which mandated X% of contracts be locally owned and minority owned businesses which meant basically being told you had to use this HVAC contractor or that Electrician because they were the only ones that ticked the right boxes.Correct, Spurs are not a construction company so hired Mace to provide the expertise to build the stadium. A lot of management roles these days do not operate in a hierarchical manner - that went out with the ark in many companies - but as I say Spurs appointing Mace gives them that authority, so its just not true that Mace cannot control the subbies.