Nazi's is cut and dried. The others are quite hard as it gets political, largely dependant on which side you might wish to take.Ok - so other war profiteers were ok - just not Nazis?
The Fighting Cock is a forum for fans of Tottenham Hotspur Football Club. Here you can discuss Spurs latest matches, our squad, tactics and any transfer news surrounding the club. Registration gives you access to all our forums (including 'Off Topic' discussion) and removes most of the adverts (you can remove them all via an account upgrade). You're here now, you might as well...
Nazi's is cut and dried. The others are quite hard as it gets political, largely dependant on which side you might wish to take.Ok - so other war profiteers were ok - just not Nazis?
I don’t think the others are quite hard at all - all about your viewpointNazi's is cut and dried. The others are quite hard as it gets political, largely dependant on which side you might wish to take.
So far as I understand, Degussa took a transparency approach when the author started researching their deep involvement in the third reich.Companies that have profited from the Nazi's absolutely, don't claim to know all of them (multiple millions have been spent by them tying to hide and erase they pasts) but have researched many, hence my limited knowledge on those already mentioned. Interestingly enough I've run a few companies that have had German offices and two of which actually promoted a list of Nazi companies for it's staff to avoid, it's what started me off.
Guido 🇺🇦 mentioned that Boss designed SS uniforms and you go into one. What the fuck is wrong with you? Touched a nerve? Relation of yours was he? Jesus you’ll defend the sickest shit.Ok - so other war profiteers were ok - just not Nazis?
No I think it's actually quite complicated, even more so today as there is so much claim and counter claim. The Nazi stuff has all had 70 years to be researched, today everyone supplies each other, then say they don't and point fingers to another. Just look a whats happening right now with Cambridge Analytica and FaceBook.I don’t think the others are quite hard at all - all about your viewpoint
The Americans profited from the war. They also helped bring an evil regime to its fucking knees. Can you say the same for your Nazi pals?Ok - so other war profiteers were ok - just not Nazis?
Guido 🇺🇦 mentioned that Boss designed SS uniforms and you go into one. What the fuck is wrong with you? Touched a nerve? Relation of yours was he? Jesus you’ll defend the sickest shit.
Have they? I’m probably missing the joke - my sense of humour has deserted me I’ll admit.Just as well Spurs have partnered up with good old English tailors, Aquascutum as their official suit supplier.
I don’t think it’s complicated at all as to what’s happened in Iraq for example.No I think it's actually quite complicated, even more so today as there is so much claim and counter claim. The Nazi stuff has all had 70 years to be researched, today everyone supplies each other, then say they don't and point fingers to another. Just look a whats happening right now with Cambridge Analytica and FaceBook.
Have they? I’m probably missing the joke - my sense of humour has deserted me I’ll admit.
Yep, my 19 year old vegan nice is trying to get me to give up any oil based "things" but especially ExxonMobil (she's onto a loser for my meat and fish) but wants me to collect her from Manchester in my car, I have an Esso fuel card. lolSo far as I understand, Degussa took a transparency approach when the author started researching their deep involvement in the third reich.
I find it a bit difficult to avoid unethical and criminal conpanies' products. I recently read some horrific stuff concerning ExxonMobil's murderous actions in Indonesia. Avoiding their products, for example, would be near impossible.
I thought that brand had been taken over by chavvy hooligans?Aquascutum makers of English soldiers trench coats in WW1 and WW2. Have also been our official club formal wear suppliers for the past couple of years.
Well that would be point in case. "We" waged War on Saddam Hussein because of Weapons of mass destruction, that never existed, in fact we fabricated the evidence to say that they existed. So why did we wage War? Were we the "baddies"? Did we do it for oil? Think that's probably the answer, but it's denied. What about Blair, why hasn't he been tried for war crimes?I don’t think it’s complicated at all as to what’s happened in Iraq for example.
Sorry mate, I’m cooked. The Arcspace/multi/bazali gang will see to that. I might be back for the Cup final (if I’m lucky).Come on Joe less than 48hrs and that card is gone, don’t encourage Arcy to press the button on you.
Technically he did have weapons of mass destruction. But they were lame, boring chemical weapons that any jackass with a lab and a couple billion dollars could put together. Not the scary, sexy nuclear weapons with uranium from Africa that the Bush Administration claimed.Well that would be point in case. "We" waged War on Saddam Hussein because of Weapons of mass destruction, that never existed, in fact we fabricated the evidence to say that they existed. So why did we wage War? Were we the "baddies"? Did we do it for oil? Think that's probably the answer, but it's denied. What about Blair, why hasn't he been tried for war crimes?
I thought that brand had been taken over by chavvy hooligans?