I didn't see his time like that. I just understood King as another Anderton type: good talent but not a player any other clubs would give a fuck about because they are so injury prone and therefore unreliable. In other words, I felt he was a passenger. I understand we will always have players who are frail, that's just the luck of the draw, but why should we celebrate them as if they achieved something? We're guilty of rewriting history.
I find it embarrassing because I don't know of any top clubs who would celebrate King's career had he been their player. The fact we celebrate King is a hallmark of our low standards, and I think they are a hangover from the nineties.