Chelsea and United are not winning much.
-
The Fighting Cock is a forum for fans of Tottenham Hotspur Football Club. Here you can discuss Spurs latest matches, our squad, tactics and any transfer news surrounding the club. Registration gives you access to all our forums (including 'Off Topic' discussion) and removes most of the adverts (you can remove them all via an account upgrade). You're here now, you might as well...
Latest Spurs videos from Sky Sports
This thread went from math lessons to English lessons
ochfacepalm:
ochfacepalm:
Christ, so much to unpack here.
Which ones? Goals and points are statistics too. Are they bullshit? Do you mean counting events, or do you mean trying to calculate probability?
For that matter, why only run a simulation 60,000 times? That's a really small sample for a supercomputer, since most laptop-using stats people seem to prefer sample sizes of 1 million simulated seasons, that I've seen. Does this supercomputer say "Casio" on the top and fit in your pocket?
¨
Which ones? Goals and points are statistics too. Are they bullshit? Do you mean counting events, or do you mean trying to calculate probability?
From what? Whose "simulator" is this? What model are they using, and what sources are they relying on for data?
Not sure what this even means. We have some real subject/object disagreement and misuse of the OED definition of the word chance. And numbers have substance? You mean some are imaginary like Hobbes said?
By whom? We aren't favourite in most models that I have seen, simply because either the model rates the players lower (for those who do ratings based on player value) or they rate other teams higher, based on things like strength of remaining schedule or the regressions they use (like payroll). That said, Paul Riley's model does rate us highest, and has done for over 2 months at this point: | Tableau Public
For that matter, why only run a simulation 60,000 times? That's a really small sample for a supercomputer, since most laptop-using stats people seem to prefer sample sizes of 1 million simulated seasons, that I've seen. Does this supercomputer say "Casio" on the top and fit in your pocket?
So, what even is this? Expected final points? Final finishing positions? By who? The only thing you've done is started an entirely new thread for a topic we already had 3 different threads for, while showing that you actually don't understand what either "statistics" or probability are.
I told you that you punched the bear trap. Now do you believe me?This thread went from math lessons to English lessons
Lucky 13 for LC?
Im so high waiting for this game, I have not got a f'ing clue what all this means=if it means anything?
Stats are 90% of the .... Hold on that's not right
Time is 90% of Stats.... No , bear with me
90% of are time-stats...
Stars are made up of 90% of time
Something like that anyways
/thread
Time is 90% of Stats.... No , bear with me
90% of are time-stats...
Stars are made up of 90% of time
Something like that anyways
/thread
I said it before and I'll say it again....
If you beat up stats, they will tell you anything?
If you beat up stats, they will tell you anything?
No, although if you beat up a stats nerd they may tell you a few things. Although a lot of it will be not very nice stuff about your mother.
“Facts are stubborn things, but statistics are pliable.”
― Mrk twain
“There are three types of lies -- lies, damn lies, and statistics.”
― benjamin Disraeli
"Most points gained during the season are best. Statistics show that the teams that have more, will finish higher"
- MrS
― Mrk twain
“There are three types of lies -- lies, damn lies, and statistics.”
― benjamin Disraeli
"Most points gained during the season are best. Statistics show that the teams that have more, will finish higher"
- MrS
WTF?? It is ok to be weird. It is not OK to be an IDIOT. Twat?
Ha, classic Scott.
Well, that joke went right by you. Sorry for causing offense...
