The Fighting Cock is a forum for fans of Tottenham Hotspur Football Club. Here you can discuss Spurs latest matches, our squad, tactics and any transfer news surrounding the club. Registration gives you access to all our forums (including 'Off Topic' discussion) and removes most of the adverts (you can remove them all via an account upgrade). You're here now, you might as well...
Sorry mate, thought we were using things that the other hadn't said as tools to dismiss their points?Righto
Sorry mate, thought we were using things that the other hadn't said as tools to dismiss their points?
Carroll's passing stats are misleading also because the majority of his passes are about 5 yards, generally one touch pass back to Jan or Toby after they've given it to him.
I watched him closely last night and he constantly one touch passed back to whoever gave it to him, normally Jan or Toby. I was being a bit hyperbolic saying he always passes backwards, but he rarely picks out a pass in the final third, creating chances. He has no ambition in his passes.Got to say Schmood I think that is complete bollocks. He picks up the ball and immediately gets his head up and looks forward for a through pass. Only when no one is available does he go sideways to move the ball on, rarely does he pass backwards.
I said the same to my dad at the start of the cup game on the weekend, we watched throughout with an eye on him and by the end my dad was convinced. Just look at get Eriksen goal for example, hugely down to Carroll's incisive defence-splitting pass. He was MotM alongside Eriksen who was doing similar.
I'd love to see his pass map from that game, no idea where to get it, but I'm positive it will show how frequently he looks for a forward pass.
I don't know if he'll get better or not, and at present he's a long way behind Dembele, but to say he's crap is completely unwarranted, I think.
You can't say he's poor because he only passes sideways or backwards ( a statement that is categorically incorrect) and then refute the evidence when it's put to you because it contradicts your claim. It's like saying the sky is red because I know it is then refusing to look up when someone points out that it's actually blue.Yea, I watch football on the grass. Not by numbers on a screen.
I didn't say that. The reason I think he's crap is multi-faceted. If you'd read the thread, you'd know that. I also acknowledged he does pass forwards, so I didn't say only.You can't say he's poor because he only passes sideways or backwards ( a statement that is categorically incorrect)
Total chances created:You can't say he's poor because he only passes sideways or backwards ( a statement that is categorically incorrect) and then refute the evidence when it's put to you because it contradicts your claim. It's like saying the sky is red because I know it is then refusing to look up when someone points out that it's actually blue.
The facts are that per 90 mins Carroll sees more ball than Dembele and only slightly less than Mason, makes more forward passes than Dembele and only one less than Mason, has more key passes than both and creates more chances than both, and that's only in the Premier League, not counting the Europa League where Carroll has put in some of his best performances.
Disagree, schmissaschmee...
As I've mentioned before he's now played 35+ games for us and not once has he influenced a game throughout or have I come away going ''fuck me was Carroll good today''. Not once. Dare I say, he's less influential than Townsend.
7/10 passes are first time passes back to the player who gives him the ball, 2/10 are sideways and 1 shows any sort of ambition of threading a gap. His defensive ability and commitment is an utter joke, he pulls out of everything, or worse, just falls over. You fart near him and he's off balance. He's Joe Allen without a beard.
Sure he's a nice kid, he's a Spurs boy and all that other cliche bollocks but Premiership football is cut-throat and you can't afford passengers. Dele Alli has shown in 6 months more than Tom has in 6 years. THAT is the standard of youngster we need. Carroll just doesn't work in our side.
He makes Dier do far too much next to him, constantly covering and getting dragged out of position as he mops up after him. Dier does a commendable job, but we need a more rounded player next to him at all times. Not a 10ft pass machine.
Sorry Tom.
He's 23, Harry started coming good at 21. He's had enough appearances and opportunities. How much slack we wanna give him? 35 games not enough? Let alone his QPR and Swansea appearances. He will never be good enough.
Moving the ball forward quickly? lol. Rarely passes it forward.
So yeah, you actually did cite those as reasons why he was rubbish and, again, that is wrong. Also, had you read my post properly you would have clearly read that I said on a per 90 minutes basis that Carroll produces more key passes and creates more chances than Dembele and Mason. It's hardly fair, and a little disingenuous, comparing totals when the other two have played more minutes than Carroll.I didn't say that. The reason I think he's crap is multi-faceted. If you'd read the thread, you'd know that. I also acknowledged he does pass forwards, so I didn't say only.
Total chances created:
Carroll = 7
Mason = 8
Dembele = 12
Not sure what stats you're looking at. Especially when saying I'm irrefutably wrong.
Your facts are wrong.
I said I know what I saw, in regards to seeing that Carroll isn't good enough and that he generally passed, one touch, back to the player who gave him the ball.
Try again.
EDIT - Oh, and the post you have quoted wasn't in response to the trajectory of his passes. Read what it was in reference to.
From one Nick to another.....Got to say Schmood I think that is complete bollocks. He picks up the ball and immediately gets his head up and looks forward for a through pass. Only when no one is available does he go sideways to move the ball on, rarely does he pass backwards.
I said the same to my dad at the start of the cup game on the weekend, we watched throughout with an eye on him and by the end my dad was convinced. Just look at get Eriksen goal for example, hugely down to Carroll's incisive defence-splitting pass. He was MotM alongside Eriksen who was doing similar.
I'd love to see his pass map from that game, no idea where to get it, but I'm positive it will show how frequently he looks for a forward pass.
I don't know if he'll get better or not, and at present he's a long way behind Dembele, but to say he's crap is completely unwarranted, I think.
Again, read the bloody thread. I acknowledged that first post was hyperbolic as was the forward thing. Read the thread before throwing things I've already conceded in my faceSo yeah, you actually did cite those as reasons why he was rubbish and, again, that is wrong. Also, had you read my post properly you would have clearly read that I said on a per 90 minutes basis that Carroll produces more key passes and creates more chances than Dembele and Mason. It's hardly fair, and a little disingenuous, comparing totals when the other two have played more minutes than Carroll.
Apologies NTS...you wanted the FA Cup game and I posted for Wednesday night.I'd love to see his pass map from that game, no idea where to get it, but I'm positive it will show how frequently he looks for a forward pass.
I can't find anything for domestic cup games either.
So wait, you use a statistics based argument about why he's not better in that area than Dembele and Mason yet deny the statistics, an area that is quantifiable; an area where the facts contradict your assertion. Nah you're right, that's completely logical.Again, read the bloody thread. I acknowledged that first post was hyperbolic as was the forward thing. Read the thread before throwing things I've already conceded in my face
Fine, whatever man, your stats may say that he's more creative than Dembele and Mason, but my eyes say different.
Look at that map hibberni just posted. Rarely does he play with any ambition. His passes are generally grouped on the left side of the halfway line. If that's key and creative to you, then more fool you.
The dude is nowhere near good enough for Spurs. Nothing you can say will change that.
Nope. I said he's shit. My first post was, he is shit, that opinion is based on watching him. Then the number monkeys turn up and I used them as a secondary tool because it seems it's the only way you people see the game and can talk football.So wait, you use a statistics based argument about why he's not better in that area than Dembele and Mason yet deny the statistics, an area that is quantifiable; an area where the facts contradict your assertion. Nah you're right, that's completely logical.
Anyway, he's clearly good enough for Spurs otherwise the manager wouldn't be selecting him.