That's not really based on facts though, is it?
Sherwood had the job quite safe up until February (even with a contract), then he went on a mental bi-polar style rampage. Let's not forget his antics:
- Claimed he could finish in the top four 'easily' to get a contract
- Claimed kudos for all the good signings, and swerved the bad
- Spilt the beans on a lot of stuff in the media that should have stayed private
- Caused the club a lot of bad PR in general
- Conducted himself poorly with opposing managers on the touchline (Jorge Jesus)
- Did weird things, like sitting in the stands for half a match
- Irked key players by persisting to play Bentaleb when he clearly wasn't ready for that role (showed promise, but clearly made odd team selections to try make himself look good)
- Publicly criticised the board on Live TV when his odd tactics failed (Lennon as a DM!)
- ...and generally talking utter bullshit every 5 minutes
He did some good things, but they will mostly be buried under the pointlessly stupid things he did. Despite the above, he would have probably kept his job if he just shut the fuck up in front of the cameras, but he couldn't help himself. He'd been at the club long enough to know that the board will tolerate almost anything except embarrassment.
Feel I've got in a strange position of defending Sherwood, who I don't like very much (as a person, rather than a manager, I think AVB seemed more decent), based on one almost offhand comment I made! It intrigues me that he stirs up so many strong feelings though. To me he just seemed to do a decent enough job in the circumstances, though you are reminding me more and more of his comments to the media and as I've said it was unprofessional.
It's true my post was not entirely based on facts but same with yours. I don't think he ever had a realistic chance of getting the job and you think it was almost his...fair enough, let's agree to disagree. I think his comments began after the Chelsea game (except maybe the comments that we would get into the top four, which was- I agree- stupid) which is when, IMO, his chances went from slim to zero, and he knew this. Then, I imagine, he felt humiliated by having "failed", but he knew that almost whatever he did he couldn't get sacked until the end of the season, until which time he had a mouthpiece to voice his anger at Levy. I'd say the gilet incident in the Villa game was also a bizarre way of doing this...it did make me laugh though.
Thinking about it, his interviews probably did harm the reputation of the club and therefore maybe, on reflection, I would give him a more neutral appraisal. It would have been better for us, and certainly for him, if he'd kept quiet. He was a bit of a mini-Redknapp in that sense, as it was very much the sort of thing Harry would have done. I think I naturally side with him because of my hatred of Levy, so part of me liked him taking it to Levy.
At the same time, Sherwood got us through to the end of a difficult season, we finished in a decent position amidst the turmoil, he played two youth players which maybe other managers would have ignored- both of which ended well for us-, crucially no one important left the club, and the scene was set for Poch to come in and do the job he did. So on balance, some good, some bad...entirely irrelevant now though, even more than the debate over whether or not Harry should have been sacked.