I like this and agree with it all but feel it's anti Dele and I'm not having that. Dele gets more minutes because he provides more balance to us linking defence, midfield and attack together. The author then omits Dele from the character type, bringing in Kane as the other "good pro" example that Kane always receives (rightly) but why omit Dele? In fact wasn't it Son that wanted to leave after his first season.
I know you are a staunch defender of Deles work rate off the ball, and that's fine.
But try to think of it like this regarding his form.
Can you imagine this team right now going through this spell with the Dele of two years ago? Talk about missing links and title challenges ......it's right there, on the pitch every week.
If people can't understand my frustration at that, I'm not sure they really understand just how good Dele is, because the guy out there this season is a mere parody account.