I've juat about learnt how to say it properly....... and I still get it wrong!!!
Mind you, I was the same with Toby's, took me ages!
"Kulu".... "Toby"..... Piece of piss.
Last edited:
The Fighting Cock is a forum for fans of Tottenham Hotspur Football Club. Here you can discuss Spurs latest matches, our squad, tactics and any transfer news surrounding the club. Registration gives you access to all our forums (including 'Off Topic' discussion) and removes most of the adverts (you can remove them all via an account upgrade). You're here now, you might as well...
I've juat about learnt how to say it properly....... and I still get it wrong!!!
Mind you, I was the same with Toby's, took me ages!
When a release clause is met then it has to be up font.
That's not true, only if it's written into the contract.
It makes no sense for a club to get the money upfront from a tax perspective, unless they plan to spend all of that money that tax year or they have a debt that has to be paid. All player values are amortised in accounts over the length of their contract.
That's not true, only if it's written into the contract.
It makes no sense for a club to get the money upfront from a tax perspective, unless they plan to spend all of that money that tax year or they have a debt that has to be paid. All player values are amortised in accounts over the length of their contract.
It makes absolute sense for clubs to get money up front so they can invest it and get a return or pay high debt (I doubt these big clubs are paying high interest rates).That's not true, only if it's written into the contract.
It makes no sense for a club to get the money upfront from a tax perspective, unless they plan to spend all of that money that tax year or they have a debt that has to be paid. All player values are amortised in accounts over the length of their contract.
At least in Spain, it most certainly is true.That's not true, only if it's written into the contract.
It makes no sense for a club to get the money upfront from a tax perspective, unless they plan to spend all of that money that tax year or they have a debt that has to be paid. All player values are amortised in accounts over the length of their contract.
If Kulusevski had all his current technical ability but Son's body, would he not be a better player? Of course technique trumps simple physicality, but his lack of acceleration and agility does cause problems time to time.BUT HES SO SLOWWWW
The fools that doubted this man should forever hang their heads in shame.
Get off FIFA ffs. Acknowledge supreme technical talent when you see it - it's not difficult!
that cut inside curler was a long time coming, that was a trademark of his from Juve/Parma, at least going by the highlights.Damn what a brace today! His first goal was crafty improvisation, and his second, absolute class. The best part is with him we know we have a legitimate future heir in the post Kane-Son era a few seasons away. It gives me shivers thinking about what could be if we had a top RWB to run alongside him.
BUT HES SO SLOWWWW
Get off FIFA ffs.
If my uncle had tits he'd be my aunt.If Kulusevski had all his current technical ability but Son's body, would he not be a better player? Of course technique trumps simple physicality, but his lack of acceleration and agility does cause problems time to time.
well, if you want to be objective in analysing a player you do. Every player has strengths and weakness and his is lack of pace/agility/onefootedness.If my uncle had tits he'd be my aunt.
The point is that you don't have to caveat his quality with 'but what if he was faster?' He's just a great talent end of.
Can't seem to beat his man, after literally beating his man and sticking it top bins.IDK i want to see more of Kulu before I call him a world class talent and a huge success. Some on here are acting like hes Messi. he cant seem to beat his man, and sometimes goes missing in games, but then crops up with a goal against weaker sides.
I do think we need that pace for balance.