I'm normally very positive about our players and team, but I'd like to think we all reserve the right to critique performance or form.
I believe Ade has been poor recently and believe he was poor last night. Granted he scored and that is really important, but he didn't offer much else.
Happy for anyone to tell me he was great last night and I'll take that on board.
I thought he did a lot better last night (and in some other games) than the wide and heavy critisism he is getting deserves.
That said, I didnt think he was especially good. I guess it depends upon your criteri judging him. For example, he wasnt a shadow of his former self and yet he still contributed a lot more than Defoe...
I thought last night he drifted in and out of the game, to much 'out' really.
When he was out he was useless.
When he was in he was linking play, moving into good areas and giving us a foothold in the final 3rd. Not to any exceptional degree, but he was doing it and it was the best we had.
I thought a number of times he played some really good one touch/triangles with Sigurdsson and Holtby.
I thought it was entirely correct that he stayed on and Defoe went off (who doesnt seem to get such a bad rap despite offering even less).
I thought it was fantastic that so late in the game he had the ethic to follow the shot in and beat two defenders to the ball for his goal.
I wasnt overly impressed with him all in all, I think he was "ok" rather than good/bad. I saw glimpses of the old Ade and hope that they were a sign he can yet make his mark on this season.
He is in a bad run, but I honestly believe it is no where near as bad as so many make out.