to be fair its an accurate representation of how this stadium case is being played outI came here to read stuff about the stadium but I just get a load of bitches on their period.
Should change the forum name to The Fighting Cunts.
The Fighting Cock is a forum for fans of Tottenham Hotspur Football Club. Here you can discuss Spurs latest matches, our squad, tactics and any transfer news surrounding the club. Registration gives you access to all our forums (including 'Off Topic' discussion) and removes most of the adverts (you can remove them all via an account upgrade). You're here now, you might as well...
to be fair its an accurate representation of how this stadium case is being played outI came here to read stuff about the stadium but I just get a load of bitches on their period.
Should change the forum name to The Fighting Cunts.
Thanks again for the input Duke. My guess is that the land will be effectively ours in about 6 months time, but as I say I hope the 'notice to treat' or whatever is served in plenty of time, so we don't have to get another CPO.
That would be a treat indeedWe will end the season with a trophy and the ability to begin work on our new stadium,
What a treat.
And there we have it. Nothing more need be said on the topic.Because even if I did have the money, as repeatedly explained, I don't think it's worth the time or effort. I can spend 10 hours+ on a football game, including travel, or 2 hours and save money. I can't afford the time and I can't afford the money.
Probably because selling tickets for a tenner to half fill your stadium to watch a team built on petro-dollars doesn't results in getting real fans through the door. As you are a perfect example of.
Not sure why the stadium atmosphere is so bad, which it is. When I've been it seems to mostly be a family-friendly crowd and most people aren't singing or chanting. Could have something to do with the fact it was an Athletics stadium that was converted? Not sure. Would be interesting if anyone who knows a lot about stadium design could give some insights.
Blackburn, Charlton, Leyton Orient, Peterborough, Southend, Sedan, SM Caen, Tours, Stade Brest, Dynamo Dresden, Eintracht Braunschweig, Hertha Berlin, Atalanta, Hellas Verona, Venezia, Academica, Dundee United, Hibernian, Almeria, Hercules, Levante, Belize, Estonia, Finland, Hong Kong, Slovenia, Tahiti...I don't think Nike will Sponsor us. We're not popular enough for them, to put it bluntly. Look at the teams they sponsor; United, Man City , PSG, Barcelona, Juve, Inter Milan...basically teams who win titles or are world-known. It simply doesn't benefit them to give us a few million a year, they've already got brand awareness.
This is the part thats a tad confusing to me....not really sure how many appeals there can be.
They were served a CPO. They appealed it and lost.
How many chances do they get here?
And if its over, why cant we just start building?
In his defence, a lot of teams with Nike (or other big brands) don't really have Nike deals but purchase them from a third party vendor and aren't really "sponsorship" deals as such.And there we have it. Nothing more need be said on the topic.
Probably because selling tickets for a tenner to half fill your stadium to watch a team built on petro-dollars doesn't results in getting real fans through the door. As you are a perfect example of.
On reason why I'm not too adverse paying £50-£60 a ticket for Spurs - it makes it too expensive for most day trippers to bother buying a ticket.
Blackburn, Charlton, Leyton Orient, Peterborough, Southend, Sedan, SM Caen, Tours, Stade Brest, Dynamo Dresden, Eintracht Braunschweig, Hertha Berlin, Atalanta, Hellas Verona, Venezia, Academica, Dundee United, Hibernian, Almeria, Hercules, Levante, Belize, Estonia, Finland, Hong Kong, Slovenia, Tahiti...
To name a few.
Needless to say, there's certainly a chance!
Personally would prefer Adidas.
Ta. I believe they are all official Nike kit sponsorships though. Absurd to suggest they only sponsor 'top' clubs in each country.In his defence, a lot of teams with Nike (or other big brands) don't really have Nike deals but purchase them from a third party vendor and aren't really "sponsorship" deals as such.
That said to argue Spurs aren't "big enough" to get a Nike deal is patently absurd.
In that case how Hibernian FC, in the Scottish Championship who have won two league cups in my lifetime, have a deal with Nike I'll never know.It's not about 'bigness' - more to do with winning stuff
ConspiracyIn that case how Hibernian FC, in the Scottish Championship who have won two league cups in my lifetime, have a deal with Nike I'll never know.
20 word summary, please
Blackburn, Charlton, Leyton Orient, Peterborough, Southend, Sedan, SM Caen, Tours, Stade Brest, Dynamo Dresden, Eintracht Braunschweig, Hertha Berlin, Atalanta, Hellas Verona, Venezia, Academica, Dundee United, Hibernian, Almeria, Hercules, Levante, Belize, Estonia, Finland, Hong Kong, Slovenia, Tahiti...
Ta. I believe they are all official Nike kit sponsorships though. Absurd to suggest they only sponsor 'top' clubs in each country.
Adidas signed the £700m deal with Man Utd not Nike. Nike actually did the numbers and it wouldn't have worked for them. Due to Adidad paying that much for Man Utd they've had to drop Andy Murray, won't renew the England cricket team and might have to drop the Lions.How many of those teams want £10+ mill a year? You could probably buy most of that list for £10 mil a year.
They only invest real money in the top teams, as does Adidas, to win brand awareness. Sure, they might invest a few pennys into L1 or L2 sides...for the exact same reason. But it's small enough to be negligible. They don't need to sponsor 3-4 big teams in a single league, as even 2 is enough.
Simply doesn't make sense for Nike to come and Sponsor us, when their gain is 0. New £700 million deal with United...Are they really gonna spend even more on Sponsorship after that, on a team in the same league? Doubt it.
I think Murray did the dropping there, not the other way aroundAdidas signed the £700m deal with Man Utd not Nike. Nike actually did the numbers and it wouldn't have worked for them. Due to Adidad paying that much for Man Utd they've had to drop Andy Murray, won't renew the England cricket team and might have to drop the Lions.
They couldn't afford to continue with him due to the Man Utd dealI think Murray did the dropping there, not the other way around
Link?They couldn't afford to continue with him due to the Man Utd deal
Apologies for it being Daily MailLink?