This cunt is on a different planet. Your legit delusional beyond belief. "The ref and the lino didn't see it so it has no bearing on the game"...So that makes it ok you utter clownshoe? Your argument is that of a 5 year old.
-
The Fighting Cock is a forum for fans of Tottenham Hotspur Football Club. Here you can discuss Spurs latest matches, our squad, tactics and any transfer news surrounding the club. Registration gives you access to all our forums (including 'Off Topic' discussion) and removes most of the adverts (you can remove them all via an account upgrade). You're here now, you might as well...
Latest Spurs videos from Sky Sports
I think I have at every single post in this very long exchange.
We can scoff at pundits and call them idiots etc. However they have (usually) played the game at the highest level and I'd prefer to listen to what they say (and filter out the obvious partisan biases they have) while making my mind up. I said, "pundits, press and MY OWN EYES".
In my pursuit of trying to really understand Law 11 having originally decided Kane was offside, I changed my mind when others posted part of the law - and argued the case. Upon looking at the full law, it only re-inforced my original view that Kane was offside.
The final straw (which threw great doubt on others' posts) was "you can only be 'active' (and therefore offside) if you touch the ball". 'Active' is defined as "touching the ball". I can't find any reference to this.
It's important that we understand the laws (especially offside), as we could get a duff decision in future. Especially with VAR coming in.
Where did I say it makes it okay?
Are you telling me the referee and the linesman should have sent Davinson Sanchez off for something they had no idea had happened until 24 hours later?
Fucking dumbass.
I admit I didn’t understand what the rules consider active prior to this incident. It feels wrong, and will likely be reviewed in due course, but I don’t think there is much debate on it being the right call.
Yep confirmed fucking idiot.
I'm saying we got fucking lucky because they didn't see a red card offence and had they seen it we would be down to 10. Your simpleton self was listing all the occasions that could have resulted in gooner scum reds conveniently forgetting our own players were guilty of reckless moments. Quit playing the victim card when we also profited from bad calls or times when officials missed incidents all together.
Sanchez stamp doesn't happen if the referee makes the correct call of sending Xhaka off.
But don't worry - you believe Sanchez should have been sent off for something the officials didn't see. Got it.
Actually, I remember you, you're the one who thought Foyth should have been sent off against Burnley for pulling out a challenge.
Please someone else tell this bafoon how dumb he's sounding. I hope you're missing the point intentionally ...if you're not please just post on RAWK or another pool forum where you can indulge in as many ' look look we're the victim' threads as you like.
Yeah, what a shame Sanchez wasn't sent off for something the officials couldn't see.
Unfortunately you seem to be thick as pig shit. The point is not registering and I can't be bothered to go over it again because your dumb self would not be able to comprehend it even after a hundred more attempts to explain it.
As I said, RAWK would literally cyber nosh you off so I suggest you become a member there.
We ShOuLd hAvE hAd A mAn SeNt oFf fOr SoMeThiNg ThE rEfErEe DiDn'T sEe
Problem is, I'm in France as a student. And from the country I'm from, I need a VISA to step foot in the UK, and it's a looong process to get one (if you're succesful in the first place). I would love nothing more than watch a Spurs game at the old WHL, but that's impossible. I've seen Spurs only once in my life, and that was vs Gent in the Europa League, and it didn't end well...
If that was the case yes, but it wasn't. It has been pointed out many times that it was a penalty. Theirs wasn't.
It's expected from their fans as they are desperate and clueless.
I was just wondering if this mass debate has changed the result or is it still 1-1?
Bunch of weirdos.
Bunch of weirdos.
Still 1-1. Going into extra time, then penalties.
Tbh if we are talking letter of the law you could make an argument that Aubameyang's was a pen. The eye test will say it clearly isn't BUT there was contact, Sanchez didn't get the ball and that decision would probably not have been reversed if VAR is around. It's swings in roundabouts tbh.
mmm... In my view it was the softest of soft penalties. I think VAR may have reversed it (but who knows? The VAR official may be reluctant to overturn the on-field ref.?)
I agree mate but I'm playing devils advocate. If we apply letter of the law then there's a case it's a pen.
Reflecting on the game, I just wanna say karmic fucking justice for you Mr Aubameyang.
Cheated for the pen; bottled the kick; then golden chance at redemption only to see Verts inexplicably come to the rescue.
Oh, and despite being out for weeks, Kane is now level with you on goals.
Enjoy the rest of your weekend arsehole. Somehow I don't think you'll be spending it making commentary videos with your mate Lacazette, or should that be Lack-of- threat!?!?!
Cheated for the pen; bottled the kick; then golden chance at redemption only to see Verts inexplicably come to the rescue.
Oh, and despite being out for weeks, Kane is now level with you on goals.
Enjoy the rest of your weekend arsehole. Somehow I don't think you'll be spending it making commentary videos with your mate Lacazette, or should that be Lack-of- threat!?!?!