The Fighting Cock is a forum for fans of Tottenham Hotspur Football Club. Here you can discuss Spurs latest matches, our squad, tactics and any transfer news surrounding the club. Registration gives you access to all our forums (including 'Off Topic' discussion) and removes most of the adverts (you can remove them all via an account upgrade). You're here now, you might as well...
No it didn't. It was two ridiculous flukey goals and our own inability to finish cos we got 2 shit wingers and a striker who has no physical presence in the box.This is basically what West Ham did last night and it got the better of Angeball
If that's the case where is the Kane replacement?
Don't say BJ like you did in the other thread and mug yourself off again please, he is not a CF he's a winger. I like the lad he has real potential but he's 10 goals tops. If you think he's a replacement for Kane you're a mug.
Where are the centre backs?
Why is he having to resort to playing Ederson last week?
Where's the ammunition coming off the bench when we need a goal?
So clearly he hasn't got the signings he wanted has he you absolute div.
He might say in his pressers that he's happy enough with what he has to work with but then he's hardly going to say otherwise when he's just through the door is he?
It's not passing in our own half that's the problem. It's the dawdling on the ball. Udogie was dawdling for no reason until his meagre passing options (thanks to angeball) dried up and he was forced to pass backward while being off balance.I'm still fuming at the way we let them snatch all three points yesterday. No point in having most of the play if we don't put away our chances!
I really don't like the constant passing in our area, just asking for trouble - do it further up the pitch.
Although not as obvious in previous games, still felt like we were punished for shoulder charges and they got away with a few fouls.
And who made them European champions, I thought that was citeh??
The Kane replacement was Johnson, he was Ange's priority signing:
View: https://twitter.com/FabrizioRomano/status/1697594369543479546
Oh he wanted him alright:
View: https://twitter.com/TheSpursExpress/status/1697628964146053362
Manager said there's no like for like replacement:
View: https://twitter.com/BBCSport/status/1690010084527550464
Actually you're right we couldn't get another CB in but we did have Sanchez who the manager was happy to let go,
Ederson doesn't play for us
The ammunition coming off the bench are currently injured mate or playing out of necessity due to the injury crisis, how are you actually struggling with this?
I think you'll find he was happy with every player we bought in unless you can tell me who the alternatives were?
He's said it on numerous occasions including this:
View: https://twitter.com/thespursweb/status/1692516161391296764
I think the problem is that you don't do enough research on your own club, you sound like a rival fan.
Yep it’s always the managers fault in the end, rather than the main men running the club who also pick said manager.Newcastle is going to be so so tough on Sunday, particularly in light of their result tonight.
Then Forest away on Friday night is far from a gimme.
All of a sudden you could be looking at where is the next win going to come from, and then you’ll have the usuals coming out with the barbed comments towards another manager, barbed comments they will never dare say against the real problem at this club.
You need a CF to replace a CF not a winger.
I'm done with this convo you are a fucking idiot.
The Kane replacement was Johnson, he was Ange's priority signing:
View: https://twitter.com/FabrizioRomano/status/1697594369543479546
Oh he wanted him alright:
View: https://twitter.com/TheSpursExpress/status/1697628964146053362
Manager said there's no like for like replacement:
View: https://twitter.com/BBCSport/status/1690010084527550464
Actually you're right we couldn't get another CB in but we did have Sanchez who the manager was happy to let go,
Ederson doesn't play for us
The ammunition coming off the bench are currently injured mate or playing out of necessity due to the injury crisis, how are you actually struggling with this?
I think you'll find he was happy with every player we bought in unless you can tell me who the alternatives were?
He's said it on numerous occasions including this:
View: https://twitter.com/thespursweb/status/1692516161391296764
I think the problem is that you don't do enough research on your own club, you sound like a rival fan.
Oh wake up ffs, its Ange cutting his cloth based on what he's been given.How many times do I need to tell you, Ange didn't want an out and out replacement, he wanted Johnson to add to our forward options
It's not my fault that you can't accept reality, you're the cause of your own frustration because you fail to understand what the manager wanted and what he currently accepts.
You're a child.
Oh wake up ffs, its Ange cutting his cloth based on what he's been given.
You need depth at CF. Richarlison is pony and Son can't do it all himself.
Get an injury to Son and we are basically fucked.
THAT's the REALITY.
Instead Levy brought in an Argentinian youngster who has had about 10 minutes all season and by accounts is already angling for a move away.
You think its bad now, wait and see what happens when Son gets injured.
I pointed it out in the summer that I couldn't understand what Ange saw in him, and I couldn't understand how Ange could see something in him given that his team was such a pure counter attacking side.
Ange couldn't possibly gauge how good Johnson's touch, short passing, combination play, and ability in tight spaces would be given that his former team just doesn't do those things.
It seems we also wanted him as a striker, which too makes no sense given his lack of strength, ability to play on the turn or with back to goal and inconsistent finishing.
Ange only really ever talked about the right character, and desire to learn, which is very important, but that alone can't be the reason you spend £50m.
Good call, JohnnySorry to disappoint you Mick but I'm an adult.
You really shouldn't be trying to talk to 12 year olds on the internet
It's not one or the other. With Kane gone we needed to make a signing for the here and now too.He's one for the future no doubt.
He said he's looking at a striker and we need to be more clinical in the forward areas.
Were not just building for this season, I'm not saying this is you but fans think we are building for this season, only 1 transfer window and people are expecting miracles.
And let's be honest villa who are not the best away did us and so did a poor Chelsea side and now west ham
It's not one or the other. With Kane gone we needed to make a signing for the here and now too.
You say he's one for the future, but if that's the case why pay £50m? And as I said there was nothing in his previous body of work to suggest he is going to develop the necessary skillset.
Compare that to someone like Udogie, who cost only 15m, is one for the future but has a lot of the fundamentals which only need to be develolped further.
You're (Mostly) wrong and amazingly naive. Only Tottenham get a hostile referee EVERY match. Spurs have had no penalties so far and 3 against. Spurs gave had 3 players sent off, and none against. Arse have had SIX penalties and it does not include the number of soft free kicks they get EVERY match.I must not have been watching properly, did the ball actually come off the referee and fall perfectly into the path of their onrushing striker for their first goal? Did he quietly whisper in Udogie's ear "give them a goal or I'll tell them all you touched me"?
I'd say a good % of people on here have acknowledged refs seem to be trying to "balance the books" since the Liverpool game, but to blame results on referees is to go looking for excuses. Fuck me it was only this Sunday just gone the referee fucked a City move by pulling the game back for an advantage. Every team is getting fucked up refs this season, not just us. Our results are in spite of that, not because of that.
I don't see what difference it makes in how much he cost, £1m or £100m, he's still young and he's still a future prospect which means he will improve under the manager's tutelage.
The price is the price, Ange wanted Johnson and the club backed him, we just have to accept it and trust the manager.
I trust the manager to do his job as far as using the talent he's got at his disposal, and his ethos but giving managers outsized auhtority over transfers has always been iffy.I don't see what difference it makes in how much he cost, £1m or £100m, he's still young and he's still a future prospect which means he will improve under the manager's tutelage.
The price is the price, Ange wanted Johnson and the club backed him, we just have to accept it and trust the manager.