It's pure speculation to claim Mason would have got us top 4.
He made some truly bizarre selection decisions in his limited time here and we struggled against every decent team we played.
Liverpool, United, Chelsea and City all have better squads than us and we have no divine right to be in the top 4. We rely on us overperforming and/or one of those teams underperforming in any given season if we are to get there.
It's not as simple as 'play more attacking football and we get top 4'.
Where the fuck have I said we have a divine right to the top 4???
We were 5 points off top 4 and dropped something like 21 or 22 from winning positions, most against absolute muck with us playing deep on the edge of our box inviting pressure onto us that cost us. I think it's fair to say that Mason wouldn't have had us playing like Stoke and he would have had the players fit (as any manager would have done, name a single team that looked as worse as we did fitness-wise - I'll give you a pass on WBA, I genuinely didn't watch more than 2 games (ours against them).
The ONLY team that we beat that was in the top ten at the point of us playing them was Leicester, who weren't on the beach when we played them and arguably it was their biggest game of the season as a win or draw against us would have given them top 4 (and £100m in revenue, hence my claim to arguably their biggest game), we won and we did it under Mason.
I didn't claim we have better squads them those other teams, I do think under Mason he'd have gotten us the 5pts we needed to get top four though, that's what's being said!
Has Utd got a better squad than us? Really? You see this is the relevance of the conversation, the parallels of us and Utd. When the dinosaur left Man U fans wanted the players replaced, the dinosaur does this, it's no different to us now, post dino people still say we need to replace half our squad. I say NO! We needed to replace the cunt of a manager. Look at Chavs and the difference Tuchel's made, same players different manager.
I'm not sure how we'll fair under Nuno, not my choice but I know as sure shit is shit he'll be better than the dinosaur on account of him having them fit and prepared, on account of having them motivated and not hung out to dry resulting in them not showing for the ball.
Next season is a new season with different challenges, will there be COVID around? How will this affect prep and training, are fans back etc.?? The way it's looking is that there will be a marked difference to this than the last, so little point in making direct comparisons as the impact of a COVID free or semi-free environment might have a big effect on some teams.
Utd have built or building a handy squad, they've still got OGS at the wheel though, their football is basic but they will smack the shitter teams that's for sure which will result in points on the board.
City is the team to beat but I think Chavs will run them close.
LFC will play or attempt to play exactly the same way under Klopp, which is what got them crawling over the line last season, it was almost on memory muscle, but have they got a better team than us?? Really?? (if you've been bashing on the players rather than the dinosaur and want wholesale changes to the squad then don't bother with a reply, I'm not listening). Their squad is ageing and there are signs of it creaking, he didn't call upon any young players last year that stood out and forced their way into the conversation (I think there was one lad in defence but can't remember his name). It's a real headscratcher how they'll do. But Klopp is a great manager (better than Nuno) and he'll probably find solutions from somewhere, I think he is the difference rather than the players.