The ONLY thing I was commenting on, if you read my posts properly, was your statement thatMonetary value is always a key indicator of talent - yes it it’s because it doesn’t matter matter which list you look at whether it is the CIES or the other the most valued squads are also the most talented and successful ones. The talent drives the value - which is why our squad is on that list. It’s stunning that someone can’t actually see this or is trying to suggest that this isn’t the case with our squad.
Again you’re weirdly obsessing over single signings and single transfer windows and ignoring the point - this is about the actual squad. Dele Ali ceased to be £5 million within a matter of games. Their initial value and talent isn’t fixed which is why he is one of our best players and in turn one of our most valuable monetary assets. United just spent £50 million on Fred - this has done nothing to enhance the quality or value of their squad because he doesn’t play and he wouldn’t attract anything near that value should they choose to sell.
But you keep on pretending that this wasn’t the argument all along - my position is quite clear we have one of the best squads in the league and one of the most valued in Europe. And I’m not alone in believing this because a number of independent publications believe the same. For some warped reason you clearly don’t and it’s clearly being driven by a desire to elevate a manager who hasn’t actually gotten the best out of that talent. Very odd behaviour.
"The MONETARY VALUE is ALWAYS a key indicator of the talent available"
You follow this absurd notion with
"United just spent £50m on Fred- this has done NOTHING to enhance the quality or value of their squad"
Thereby totally contradicting yourself, as usual you tie yourself up in knots.
Hows that living under a bridge going for you, well I hope.