With respect mate none of that you can assess from the clip provided. It shows his touches and only his time on the ball. How you can "spin" a negative about him watching that is frankly amazing. He is clearly playing as a DM. The touches on the ball show him doing what we want from a DM, dropping between the CB and playing it out, you can see that almost all the time he receives the ball he is being pressed, I'd say that is one of the most positive showings of a player in the position as you will ever see.
As for loaning out or keep in the squad right now I am all in favour of keeping our best prospects in the squad. Just look at Winks, very, very rare to see a young lad get MOTM and look so confident and at ease on the ball (and in a London Derby) for his first League start! This surely is down to the fact that he has been training with the team for a long time, he's accepted as one of the lads, knows how to prepare and is fully assimilated into the teams match day rituals. he knows how we play, what his role is, what the other players around him are doing.
It's still early days to fully assess if this is the way forward but if our best prospects give such accomplished performances as Winks has done then I'm all for it. For me at least, it makes perfect sense of backing our coaching ability to bring on an academy products to play for the shirt and only our shirt, with the style of football we want. I look to the great academy's around the world Ajax, Barca, Manure (not currently), Southampton even. None of their best prospects go out on loan, only those that can see an opportunity to make money out of. Why the fuck spend £60m on the greatest training centre in world football if you don't trust in your ability to use it?
The clip, I expect, shows his involvement in the game through his touches. If he had made some important tackles or interceptions, I expect they would've been shown. I might be wrong.
The lack of creativity and end product and the lack of defensive positioning that I'm mentioning is not something I observed from the clip, but from his appearances for our first team.
What I do observe from the clip is his passing: Although he most often finds his man, he very often puts said man in trouble by not putting enough pace on the ball.
I'm not saying he's shit. I am saying he has areas that needs substantial improvement. He needs maturity. He needs responsibility. If you lack those, you won't get it from sitting on the bench or from playing for the reserves. You get it from playing for a club where you're the one they look to, where the club require from you to go out there and make a difference, but where the pressure is a bit lower than in a top club.
There isn't a one way fits all approach to developing players. Some have the personality, the confidence and the ability to perform for a top club from day one. Onomah strikes me as one who doesn't. He seems to lack the desire/drive to affect the result. That's why he mostly looks like a passenger when he's playing for us; one that is happy to just ride along.
When Mason and Kane came through they seemed more hungry to create, to affect, to make an impact. Big club players need that attitude.
Our academy is great. Spending money on fantastic facilities and superb staff to develop players is a great investment. In rare cases they will develop players with the drive, attitude, personality and confidence to go directly from the academy to the first team. In many other cases, I think they can only take a player to a point where he needs what I've talked about before, where what's best for his development is to spend time at a club where he is relied upon to produce. Hell, it may even be good to go to a lower level club and experience adversity - as in the cases of Kane and Mason.
Being number 16-22 in a squad for several years, though, rarely does a player any good (Townsend, Naughton...)