They seem very desperate. They've been twerking all window to sell either Gallagher or Broja. And it's always either one rumour at a time or the other, which means that they are generating those rumours in order to sell only one of them, not both.
-
The Fighting Cock is a forum for fans of Tottenham Hotspur Football Club. Here you can discuss Spurs latest matches, our squad, tactics and any transfer news surrounding the club. Registration gives you access to all our forums (including 'Off Topic' discussion) and removes most of the adverts (you can remove them all via an account upgrade). You're here now, you might as well...
Latest Spurs videos from Sky Sports
...I wonder which league Lukaku is trying to sell himself to
View: https://twitter.com/FabrizioRomano/status/1750461565793448390
Probably to the one that pays the most!
I miss Lamela
This will likely be a feature for all clubs going forward, if P&S has more bite than bark.
Those with multiple players on a high wage over multiple years may just have to tighten their belts until they are able to offload a lot of these wages, which will be highly unlikely if those players refuse to move to a lesser wage.
Stare those fcuking cnuts out. No one should do anything that assists them, unless it suits any buyer more. We ain't desperate.
Broja is average and not on our compass.. Gallagher, who knows.
But fcuk them.
Last edited:
What Chelsea need is another Chelsea who will buy Broja for £50m like they bought Enzo and Caicedo for £100m a piece.
Nice one levy btw if gallagher interest is one big blag.
View: https://x.com/Daily_Hotspur/status/1750807579905724576?s=20
Tottenham have already considered the offer and decided that it's a fucking stupid idea unless they want to spend real oil dollars and cough up 40m.
Loaning him out to another PL side would make zero sense
Funny enough, Poch never compared Kane to anyone when giving him a glowing review. In fact, it took desperation to even play him.
And fair play to Harry for taking that chance.
See my reply to
Larry David
below Salah was epic against us and was by far the best player on the pitch. Almost every Spurs fan wanted him after that, and if not for Chelsea, I reckon we would have got him. And played him. Unlikely Chelsea. Who signed him to stop rivals having him.
He's already missed 14 games for Sevilla this season through 2 injuries.
He missed aprox 150 games during his 5 or 6 seasons at Spurs.
In a way, regardless as to how bad Gil has been, getting Lamela's wages off the books and an "asset" in return" isn't bad.
To my mind, if we sell Gil today for £10m that's fair. Lamela was and is worthless. As in, nobody would have paid money.
So realistically it wasn't £20m + Lamela. It was £20m and Lamela's wages off the books.
Oh...so loaning Gil to Brighton to get Ferguson.... 
www.express.co.uk
Evan Ferguson swap deal arises for Tottenham as Brighton 'express interest'
Tottenham may soon have the opportunity to lure Evan Ferguson from Brighton.
www.express.co.uk
Lamela was better than Gil. Irrespective of how much he was worth, he just had a bigger impact on games. Gil is a "prospect" that we all really wanted to work - we wanted our Bernado Silva - but it wasn't to be. He isn't good enough for us.Funny enough, Poch never compared Kane to anyone when giving him a glowing review. In fact, it took desperation to even play him.
And fair play to Harry for taking that chance.
See my reply to
Salah was epic against us and was by far the best player on the pitch. Almost every Spurs fan wanted him after that, and if not for Chelsea, I reckon we would have got him. And played him. Unlikely Chelsea. Who signed him to stop rivals having him.
He's already missed 14 games for Sevilla this season through 2 injuries.
He missed aprox 150 games during his 5 or 6 seasons at Spurs.
In a way, regardless as to how bad Gil has been, getting Lamela's wages off the books and an "asset" in return" isn't bad.
To my mind, if we sell Gil today for £10m that's fair. Lamela was and is worthless. As in, nobody would have paid money.
So realistically it wasn't £20m + Lamela. It was £20m and Lamela's wages off the books.
Yeah I totally get all that but I still miss himFunny enough, Poch never compared Kane to anyone when giving him a glowing review. In fact, it took desperation to even play him.
And fair play to Harry for taking that chance.
See my reply to
Salah was epic against us and was by far the best player on the pitch. Almost every Spurs fan wanted him after that, and if not for Chelsea, I reckon we would have got him. And played him. Unlikely Chelsea. Who signed him to stop rivals having him.
He's already missed 14 games for Sevilla this season through 2 injuries.
He missed aprox 150 games during his 5 or 6 seasons at Spurs.
In a way, regardless as to how bad Gil has been, getting Lamela's wages off the books and an "asset" in return" isn't bad.
To my mind, if we sell Gil today for £10m that's fair. Lamela was and is worthless. As in, nobody would have paid money.
So realistically it wasn't £20m + Lamela. It was £20m and Lamela's wages off the books.
Oh...so loaning Gil to Brighton to get Ferguson....
Evan Ferguson swap deal arises for Tottenham as Brighton 'express interest'
Tottenham may soon have the opportunity to lure Evan Ferguson from Brighton.
Not a chance that’s true.
Maybe they take Gil but that’s it
Fergie has really gone off the boil. 1 in his last 15.Oh...so loaning Gil to Brighton to get Ferguson....
Evan Ferguson swap deal arises for Tottenham as Brighton 'express interest'
Tottenham may soon have the opportunity to lure Evan Ferguson from Brighton.
It's in the Express so a dodgy source.
In the summer 100m was getting thrown around as the number for Ferguson. Think everyone will be waiting to see what happens next with him before investing.
I can't see us looking for strikers ATM.
Maybe in the summer?
Can people please stop comparing Bryan Gil to Antonio Nusa? Not the same player!
And is the logic now - since Gil failed - that we can't sign the best, young prospects? Would be delighted for this to go through