January 2020 transfer thread

  • The Fighting Cock is a forum for fans of Tottenham Hotspur Football Club. Here you can discuss Spurs latest matches, our squad, tactics and any transfer news surrounding the club. Registration gives you access to all our forums (including 'Off Topic' discussion) and removes most of the adverts (you can remove them all via an account upgrade). You're here now, you might as well...

    Get involved!

Latest Spurs videos from Sky Sports

Status
Not open for further replies.
So, according to that people are going to show up no matter what the chairman does....so therefore your views on Levy are basically irrelevant to most fans...
Yes, they probably are.

But you agree that most fans turn up regardless of their views on the owners?
At least that's a start.

:dierpochhug:
 
Yes, they probably are.

But you agree that most fans turn up regardless of their views on the owners?
At least that's a start.

:dierpochhug:

Don’t know, when you move a club from a football stadium into a giant athletics track half of them fuck off like West Ham but yeh mostly.
 
Don’t know, when you move a club from a football stadium into a giant athletics track half of them fuck off like West Ham but yeh mostly.
Although they still pull in over 20k more each week than they did at upton park.

Which kinda further proves my point that BangkokSpud BangkokSpud is talking petulant nonsense when he claims a full house at WHL tomorrow somehow proves that everyone is on board with ENIC.
It simply isn't the case.
 
Taking a while for some to see it. But very gradually more & more are working this out.
Not really true though is it? It’s still just you and JT plus a couple of new members who are massively anti Levy or anti ENIC or anti the board. Anti something anyway. If you think you are at the forefront of some massive movement of the people, you may need to give yourself a slap.

Almost every single other member of this forum seems to be ok with what’s happening or I’m sure they’d be more vociferous in their complaints.
 
Again, this is disingenuous BC because this is not what you are arguing when we keep hearing you 'youth watchers'.

No Todd. This is exactly what most, if not all of us are arguing, and has always been the core of my argument.

I am under no illusion that it is only very few academy kids that are even worth a chance, and that even then a tiny fraction of those will prove ultimately good enough to be viable squad use, and an even smaller fraction will end up as first team regular material.

But all I’m arguing is that we make better use of that free (kind of) resource , that doesn’t have to be world beaters at all to be viable and have some use to us as a squad, because very few of our purchases are even close to that standard and that we apply some of the same standards and criteria to them as to purchases, who also have a very small chance of being “world beaters” and rarely turn out to be.

Here’s a great example. Why the fuck has Mourinho given 60 minutes in central midfield to a 21yo who was failing to get a game for one of Portugal bully teams, and given 0 minutes to Oliver Skipp,who has proven to be a very competent midfielder on his limited chances.

And you frequently say that our academy players don’t deserve more chance if they don’t “shine” when they are given chances, so do you think Gedson’s 7 touches in 60 minutes means he should be done now? Or do you think he’ll still get more chances than Skipp. Did Onomah ever have an appearance where he averaged a touch every ten minutes ?

It took Aurier a year to learn how to take throw ins, and largely was atrocious every time he got a start, getting sent off, giving away penalties, costing us goals, why was he not judged after two games like KWP? It's taken him 3 seasons - and finally getting a consistent run of games - to start looking like a viable option - and he'll still never be a world beater, why do we not make similar allowances for the very exceptional academy player?

All most of us are arguing is for a more logical and sensible approach. We are pissing away resources. We aren't a club blessed with the resources of most of our main rivals.

We spend 12-14 years in many cases teaching and preparing footballers, they get picked internationally, win major international tournaments, play well in pre season games against good quality opposition, get minutes off the bench, get the odd cup start, and if they have made that stage (which is rare) and don't shit the bed at any of the numerous stages, then they are ready for the next test. The next test would normally be to go on loan and get regular proper football, or to be given more game time with our first team.

But under Poch this absolutely crucial next stage of development was largely removed, so a bunch of the most promising kids our academy has produced were not playing proper football at the most vital stage of their development. They weren't even playing U23 football any more. They were just put on ice.

And where players like Rose were allowed to cunt Poch, Levy, the club and fans off ion the media and still get picked, all Edwards had to do was be in a bit of a teenage huff to be deemed a lost cause.
 
Last edited:
The window finished in true Enic fashion.

A future value for money signing we didnt really need, bullshit rumours about trying for a superstar and leaving a manager desperately short in a crucial area.

The pattern has been there for years and numerous managers have got the blame for it, yesterday I saw people blaming poch but if course there has always been a constant.

I'm not mad, I expected it just like I expect people to reply to me with odd defenses of them but it does feel like we all need to either accept that were run by an investment company who put profits before anything or actually start putting pressure on them.

I'm baffled though. Why bring in the most lauded demanding manager in the world to then not back him? And yes we did some good stuff but to have no striker for a manager who clearly needs a target man / battering ram for his system is insane. I mean levy wouldn't get rid of a his accountants and tell the board to just get on with it would he?

Bankrupt made the excellent point on twitter yesterday that we clearly want players who we can add value too. Ones we cant take a punt on, why not do that with a striker then? We have spent the month seemingly chasing average over priced strikers and then refused to pay for them, which I understand but why chase them in the first place?

I think we got lucky with Poch. Whether you want to give poch the credit it for it or not we hit gold. It all came together. The centre backs gelled brilliantly. The full backs were turned from brainless athletes into machines, dembele was better than anyone thought and were still suffering from his absence now, dele took the premier league amazingly and of course kane went from millwall reject to megastar. I'm not saying we didnt earn it but to have all those things go right at once was brilliant and its helped us pay for this amazing stadium and actually build a brand. But we have to keep it up.

Were now probably going to lose 100 million in TV money next year so you think were going to invest properly ? Are we fuck.

I like levy and am thankful for this beautiful stadium but it isnt one way. We pay the most ridiculous ticket prices in europe. Prices that have ensured I can barely afford to go and I'm sure that's the same for thousands. Being that we pay through the nose, being that we have the best football stadium in the world, best training ground, most successful manager why the fuck dont we have one fit striker over the age of 18? Why do we now only have one senior specialist right back, why do we have these debates every transfer window? It's crazy that he runs every other part of the business with such precision and efficiency and yet team building the thing that the whole business relies on is seemingly treated like an afterthought. The cheeky so and so actually moaned a few weeks ago about the obsession with spending money on transfers whilst he charges his customers some of the highest prices in the world.

The balance has always been off but now so more than ever. You fired the manager that finally got you regularly to the top table , did it whilst filming a shitty documentary so his humiliation will probably be filmed and brought in this megastar manager which lets be honest has left a sour taste in many people's mouths and now you still dont support the new manager and leave him trying to explain your baffling transfer policy.

Whether you anti poch or pro poch, whether you love Mourinho or hate him and especially whether you think levy is the football god or a parasite we should all agree that our squad building and investment choices have to be improved.
Quality post, keep preaching to us believers.
Levy is a disgrace, your right he seems to treat the most important aspect of a football club, the team as an afterthought. Personally I think we should be demanding more and forcing enic to sell, not sure that's really possible but hey we should be trying to force his hand.. As you so perfectly put it, we pay insane prices but get mugged off by levy and his second rate squad players we don't need and heavily unbalanced squad..
But those of us with our eyes wide open know that leopards don't change their spots, and levy is the spottiest leopard ever seen
 
Your idea of "SUPPORT" is to cunt off the most successful owners we've ever had .... Newcastle and Utd fans would give their eyeteeth to have Levy in charge ... only sad entitled idiots like you can't see that.

After weeks of cunting off the club and all the fans who stand behind the whole club not just the bits you like - suddenly you're claiming to be a super fan who sticks with the club through thick and thin ... what a two-faced hypocrite you are. Put your money where you fat gob is or give it up ... you're full of shit and your last five posts have just proven that to everyone ... jog on until you've grown a pair.
Most successful owners ever really ? Maybe they are , but that comment kind of made me go...WHAT
 
Except you believ wrong .... you just made up numbers to support your thinking, why?

Kane missed 14 games in 16/17 from a possible 53 - that's 26%

Kane missed just 4 games in 17/18 from a possible 55 - that's just 7%

and this year he will likely miss something close to 30% .... depending on his return date ....

Ronaldo missed 11 games in 8/9 then 10 games in 9/10 like Kane two seasons badly blighted by muscle injuries, in his case ankle ... however since recovering from two bad years he then had seven consecutive years without a lengthy injury absence until a torn collateral in 16/17

The point, which clearly went over your head, is that two years of muscle injuries do not mean your career is finished or that you will continue to have the same issues - as Ronaldo proves if you look after yourself you can still go on to manage 50 games a season without major injuries ...

Do you get it now?
With the up most respect. I don't think this means what you think it means. You really are comparing apples and oranges in regards muscle injuries and ankle ligament damage. Now throw in a ruptured achilles tendons and long term prognosis starts looking a lot less secure. It kills me to say this but I am very concerned Kane will increasingly offer pretty much what Glen Murray does. Height decent finish but little mobility and less pace. I assume we think Parrot is both the long and mid term solution.
 
Sorry mate, but this isn't true about TAA, he has played RB since U16 and he was very highly rated by England coaches (he scored 6 goals in 10 games from RB for the England U19s) and I dont know how you could possibly compare who was more highly rated by national youth coaches when they played different age groups.
This is fantastic to know. Thank you for clarifying this point.
 
The window finished in true Enic fashion.

A future value for money signing we didnt really need, bullshit rumours about trying for a superstar and leaving a manager desperately short in a crucial area.

The pattern has been there for years and numerous managers have got the blame for it, yesterday I saw people blaming poch but if course there has always been a constant.

I'm not mad, I expected it just like I expect people to reply to me with odd defenses of them but it does feel like we all need to either accept that were run by an investment company who put profits before anything or actually start putting pressure on them.

I'm baffled though. Why bring in the most lauded demanding manager in the world to then not back him? And yes we did some good stuff but to have no striker for a manager who clearly needs a target man / battering ram for his system is insane. I mean levy wouldn't get rid of a his accountants and tell the board to just get on with it would he?

Bankrupt made the excellent point on twitter yesterday that we clearly want players who we can add value too. Ones we cant take a punt on, why not do that with a striker then? We have spent the month seemingly chasing average over priced strikers and then refused to pay for them, which I understand but why chase them in the first place?

I think we got lucky with Poch. Whether you want to give poch the credit it for it or not we hit gold. It all came together. The centre backs gelled brilliantly. The full backs were turned from brainless athletes into machines, dembele was better than anyone thought and were still suffering from his absence now, dele took the premier league amazingly and of course kane went from millwall reject to megastar. I'm not saying we didnt earn it but to have all those things go right at once was brilliant and its helped us pay for this amazing stadium and actually build a brand. But we have to keep it up.

Were now probably going to lose 100 million in TV money next year so you think were going to invest properly ? Are we fuck.

I like levy and am thankful for this beautiful stadium but it isnt one way. We pay the most ridiculous ticket prices in europe. Prices that have ensured I can barely afford to go and I'm sure that's the same for thousands. Being that we pay through the nose, being that we have the best football stadium in the world, best training ground, most successful manager why the fuck dont we have one fit striker over the age of 18? Why do we now only have one senior specialist right back, why do we have these debates every transfer window? It's crazy that he runs every other part of the business with such precision and efficiency and yet team building the thing that the whole business relies on is seemingly treated like an afterthought. The cheeky so and so actually moaned a few weeks ago about the obsession with spending money on transfers whilst he charges his customers some of the highest prices in the world.

The balance has always been off but now so more than ever. You fired the manager that finally got you regularly to the top table , did it whilst filming a shitty documentary so his humiliation will probably be filmed and brought in this megastar manager which lets be honest has left a sour taste in many people's mouths and now you still dont support the new manager and leave him trying to explain your baffling transfer policy.

Whether you anti poch or pro poch, whether you love Mourinho or hate him and especially whether you think levy is the football god or a parasite we should all agree that our squad building and investment choices have to be improved.

Thus spoke Zarathustra.

ENIC is making some disasterous decisions at the moment in the transfer market, instead of trying to push on they risk taking us back to midtable I feel.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom