Both of which are your opinion
I think he was trash as a player and is worse as an analyst.
Which makes his opinions more valid?
How many of them thousands are Liverpool supporters?
The "world class" argument is a nonsense anyway. Similar to the "big" club argument.
Both are subjective and the media will move the goal posts when it suits them.
It is usually just thrown around when they've got nothing left to say about a player as it's impossible to prove/disprove.
In Kanes case it is being used in a negative light.
"Kanes a one-season wonder" - Nope
"Well hes a only a 2-season wonder" - Nope
"Well he only scores tap ins" - Nope
"Well he only scores tap ins and worldies but can't score with his head" - Nope
...
"Well he's not world class"
The only thing I give Carragher credit for is that he at least defined what he thought "world class" was before telling us his opinion.
We all know that if Kane was a Liverpool player (sorry for that thought
) that the article would read quite differently.