I think there’s two routes to look at this - the business route and the football route. The biggest objection on here seems to be that he’s too expensive and his wages are too high. That’s the business answer. The footballing objection seems to be that he is old and has no motivation and he’s always injured.
If we take the finances out of it and he hypothetically came on a free transfer or loan and Madrid paid 100% of his wages, would this still be a bad idea? Does a bale who plays say 25 games for us this season make us better or worse? Is he an upgrade on lamela or Lucas? Since he went to Madrid he has played 251 times for them scoring 105. And that’s with Zidane refusing to play him for what seems like half the time. Lamela has played 220 times for us in the same period scoring 33. So Bales on the pitch more contributing more than what we already have.
i think bale makes us better than we are now, so it’s an improvement. Same with Hart. It’s not about him being better than Hugo, it’s about being better than Vorm. He makes the squad better. He wins football matches. Better squad, better team, more depth, better mentality, winner. He doesn’t stop some potential wonder signing coming in. Brings more eyes, more sponsorship, more money, raises our profile. Paying out 100m in fees or wages to Bale for 2 years isn’t going to cripple us on the slim chance it is a complete disaster. But if it works it could propel us in to that next winning tier that we have been doing the hokey kokey with for a while now.
it’s a yes from me.