No way Chiriches should be changed for Kaboul
@Millbanks
Give me a good reason why you'd drop Chiriches, who has been excellent recently, for Kaboul then?
The Fighting Cock is a forum for fans of Tottenham Hotspur Football Club. Here you can discuss Spurs latest matches, our squad, tactics and any transfer news surrounding the club. Registration gives you access to all our forums (including 'Off Topic' discussion) and removes most of the adverts (you can remove them all via an account upgrade). You're here now, you might as well...
No way Chiriches should be changed for Kaboul
What a brilliant analysis!!Some more facts about the game - some flattering AVB, some not. Unlucky basically.
http://www.statsbomb.com/2013/11/statsbomb-mythbusting-christian-eriksen-vs-newcastle/
How Rare Was Eriksen’s 9 Key Pass performance?
I wanted to look at this because maybe this type of performance happens all the time. I may have found it impressive, but if it’s a common occurrence, then we can rule out my impression and just write it off as something any decent footballer can do.
I only have access to a shortened data set on this one (last year plus this year), but out of more than 1800 matches played in the big 5 leagues last season, there were fifteen times where a player had nine or more KP. Players who produced those performances included: Pirlo, Ozil, Diamanti (who also had 14 shots in the same match, one of the most absurd statistical performances I have ever seen), Boudebouz x 2, Obraniak, Farfan, Diego x 2, Tobias Werner (who?), Valeron, Susaeta, Rakitic, Jose Antonio Reyes, and Koke.
There has also been one 9+ KP game this season, produced by the ageless Francesco Totti.
So 16 total instances in more than 2000 matches. That’s less than 1%. It’s fair to say that’s rare.
“[Eriksen] went into hiding, fitting with the stereotype of the scouting reports.”
Really? Dude had 81 touches, or 14 more than any other Spurs offensive player. He was also only dispossessed one time. Townsend had 4 in a full match, Sigurdsson had 4 in 69 minutes. This statement is just silly.
Some more facts about the game - some flattering AVB, some not. Unlucky basically.
http://www.statsbomb.com/2013/11/statsbomb-mythbusting-christian-eriksen-vs-newcastle/
I'd add Rose to that list, but then he and Walker do have the luxury of not being pushed for their spot.
Because I believe that Kaboul is a better all-round player. Simple as that really. I don't disagree that Chiriches hasn't been playing well, but I don't think he can play with Verts (as stated before, both are 'attacking minded' centre backs), and Verts is my first choice centre back by far.@Millbanks
Give me a good reason why you'd drop Chiriches, who has been excellent recently, for Kaboul then?
Obv.
But if you're getting tired out playing Sheriff or Tromso followed by a Premier League game then there isn't going to be much hope when you've got to play Barca or Bayern followed by a Premier League game.
we didn't attract fuck all last time around, we won't suddenly get loads of new players once we qualify. I just don't think the CL is suddenly going to end this issue.Thats not really what I meant I don't think their tired out, we have been using squad rotation anyway. My point is if we were in the CL we would attract better players (and better squad depth) to improve our results and get higher gate receipts and prize money to support the purchases.
Continually finishing 5th means we have to rotate to players who may not be our first team choice, if we were in CL we could probably field a stronger squad in all games. Our first team might also be of a higher quality.
So I'm not saying our players aren't fit enough to complete 2 games a week, but surely we would attract better players once we were in the CL.
we didn't attract fuck all last time around, we won't suddenly get loads of new players once we qualify. I just don't think the CL is suddenly going to end this issue.
Regular CL would improve the club, that's a given. But using the Europa League as a reason for us losing games is weak, that's my stance on it. The Newcastle defeat wasn't because we were tired.But look at the players we lost as a result of not being in the CL...I think you would need a couple of seasons being in the CL to justify players coming to our club to see the true effect, we only had one year then were back down again which didn't do us many favours. Once the high profile players are here they'll attract more big players. Just look at the whole Willian situation, even though I'm not fussed we didn't get him playing for a CL club was probably a factor.
CL qualification is probably not going to end the issue though on it's own, but it would surely help the club more than being in uefa.
Though I agree with what you are saying, just to play devil's advocate ....we didn't attract fuck all last time around, we won't suddenly get loads of new players once we qualify. I just don't think the CL is suddenly going to end this issue.
I don't know why everyone still thinks CL is the be-all-and-end-all for players.we didn't attract fuck all last time around, we won't suddenly get loads of new players once we qualify. I just don't think the CL is suddenly going to end this issue.
that was an anomaly given how we signed him tbhThough I agree with what you are saying, just to play devil's advocate ....
We did attract one gem (where I'd like to think CL played a big factor) ... :vdvdive:
Talk about bad memories, will never forget this guys name cos of that FA cup game.Or Jon Macken
*takes shoe off*Lets just pretend we won. It is nicer that way.
Lets just pretend we won. It is nicer that way.
*takes shoe off*
The Newcastle defeat wasn't because we were tired.
I would agree with Keane, and was slightly pleased when it didn't work out for him there (I fucking despise Liverpool), but the other 4, no.Conversely continuing to finish 5th is detrimental to the clubs reputation and finances and since we will continue to loose all our best players (Carrick, Berbatov, Keane, Modric, Bale etc) who have all gone to CL clubs when they were playing well for us.