You're in the zone.I can, because had the goal stood, City would have had to kick off, not take a free kick from their box.
Every kick from that point on would have been different.
Nothing will change your mind
Not even rational common sense
The Fighting Cock is a forum for fans of Tottenham Hotspur Football Club. Here you can discuss Spurs latest matches, our squad, tactics and any transfer news surrounding the club. Registration gives you access to all our forums (including 'Off Topic' discussion) and removes most of the adverts (you can remove them all via an account upgrade). You're here now, you might as well...
You're in the zone.I can, because had the goal stood, City would have had to kick off, not take a free kick from their box.
Every kick from that point on would have been different.
Yes - and we could have also lost 8:1. Point?
You're in the zone.
Nothing will change your mind
Not even rational common sense
We saw what TS is made of at the team selection already and the first 40 mins - but that's in the past now and what matters is how we respond from there onits a better platform to see what TS was made of.
hardlyDo you think that the 2nd half would have been identical had the goal stood?
Every kick?
Goal was offside - Dawson kicked it in - disallowed correctlyI know its a valid assumption. Just like mine is...and?
And the bottom line is that Dawson was not offside, which is all Ive argued.....where as earlier you are on record as saying:
"Dawson WAS offside"
That is incorrect.
We saw what TS is made of at the team selection already and the first 40 mins - but that's in the past now and what matters is how we respond from there on
We've already established that is not the case - why do your keep repeating the same thing?We saw that he made some error's, but at the end of the day, we equalized despite those error's and the linesman incorrectly ruled out the goal.
hardly
they might have scored 8 more
aliens may have landed on the pitch
Jimmy Greaves might have had a renaissance and come on and buried 10 past Hart
We've already established that is not the case - why do your keep repeating the same thing?
How do you know he wouldn't have made a similar tackle in a similar situation?Exactly....and more realistically, Rose would not have been in that position, and at 1-1 and 11 men, I would have expected a better platform to see what our manager could do.
Goal should not have stood - that's all that mattersDawson was not offside.
Wrong to flag him off and rule out his goal.
Goal was offside - Dawson kicked it in - disallowed correctly
I don't post on arse-mania (did it a few times 6-7 years ago and it was a mistake to reason with those vermin) - the only one making a fool of himself here and resorting to pathetic insults like a 13 year old is the one saying he can predict the futureThat makes no sense whatsoever....you are in a frenzy....maybe you should take this up with your mates at arse-mania. Probably get more respect there
The only reason you keep arguing this is in a sad attempt to save face for your beloved Timmy, exonerating him from all responsibility for last night's result
We were battered for 30 minutes, but we equalized and it was wrongly chalked off.
The midfield was the wrong pick, but the officials dissalowed a good equalizer. We showed heart, and were in the game until the officials then sent off Rose and gave a penalty for perfectly clean tackle.
Why would I write off AVB's shit management?
Im not writing off Tim Sherwoods mistakes from last night, or that we got it wrong in the middle. But we played better, got ourselves back into the game, and had our hands cut off by the linesman.
Unless you think the lino had no effect on the game of course
It was the wrong decision, (to play Bentaleb) and it was'nt the only one he made.
I was far more concerned by Siggy's inclusion, and why Lennon was allowed to play as the Invisible Man for such a large period in the first half.
I also think that Dembele could have played further forward, with Capoue behind him helping Bentaleb.
Or Holtby could have come in for Siggy (or Bentaleb) before the lino ended all hope for us.
Lots to consider regarding Sherwoods faults last night.....
I wasnt happy with both, because yesterday showed neither.
We were battered for 30 minutes, but we equalized and it was wrongly chalked off.
The midfield was the wrong pick, but the officials dissalowed a good equalizer. We showed heart, and were in the game until the officials then sent off Rose and gave a penalty for perfectly clean tackle.
Why would I write off AVB's shit management?
Im not writing off Tim Sherwoods mistakes from last night, or that we got it wrong in the middle. But we played better, got ourselves back into the game, and had our hands cut off by the linesman.
Unless you think the lino had no effect on the game of course
It was the wrong decision, and it was'nt the only one he made.
Your hysterical obsession with Bentaleb and Capoue is making you look more and more clueless and delerious.
I was far more concerned by Siggy's inclusion, and why Lennon was allowed to play as the Invisible Man for such a large period in the first half.
I also think that Dembele could have played further forward, with Capoue behind him helping Bentaleb.
Or Holtby could have come in for Siggy (or Bentaleb) before the lino ended all hope for us.
Lots to consider regarding Sherwoods faults last night.....but continue with your pathetic, one track agenda filled bullshit, if it provides you with a sense of relief and false righteousness.
As if playing Bentaleb instead of Capoue last night was the one, sinlgle factor in our defeat.
Admit it....you longed for that result didnt you?
haha deluded,Tim sherwood's man management is far worse than AVB's. Capoue has been frozen out, Holtby has been told to piss offf, Chadli's agent said he wants to leave, Lloris suggests he is going. You can't see past your blind hatred for AVB, that sherwood is a clueless prick.We need someone with brain and real managerial experience in the summer. that's Van gaal for me.