Problem is why wasnt the kane money added into the money put aside already for transfers.
If you look at the basic arithmetic we have a net spend of some £160m over 2 years - so that includes the Kane money.
Gross over 2 years (to avoid all the arguments as to how to allocate Porro and Kulusevski fees) gross spend is about £350m (ie £175m pa) - and that is only affordable with the £100m from Kane.
All in sudoku 's excellent post and listing on the previous page.