Summer Transfer Thread 2023! - Closed (Maybe)

  • The Fighting Cock is a forum for fans of Tottenham Hotspur Football Club. Here you can discuss Spurs latest matches, our squad, tactics and any transfer news surrounding the club. Registration gives you access to all our forums (including 'Off Topic' discussion) and removes most of the adverts (you can remove them all via an account upgrade). You're here now, you might as well...

    Get involved!

Latest Spurs videos from Sky Sports

Rate this window out of 10

  • 1

  • 2

  • 3

  • 4

  • 5

  • 6

  • 7

  • 8

  • 9

  • 10


Results are only viewable after voting.
So you agree that when people say « just pay the fee » they are talking nonsense?
Strategically identifying and targeting players with feasible release clauses has become an increasingly important aspect of transfer business at major clubs, that should be mentioned even with your point being broadly correct.

Have Spurs EVER secured a player via payment of a release clause?
 
What is your point?

You want Spurs - the first British club to win the league and cup double and the first British club to win a UEFA Competition - to be a club with the best stadium in the world, best training facilities in the world, one of the highest revenues in the world, amongst the most profitable in the world, formally had the best srriker in the world....


but at the same time Spurs should settle for the same outcomes as "many clubs in the football league"?

You are cool with this great football club having the same goals as Blackburn? or Wolves?

What has that got to do with what I quoted?

"Yes but the primary goal for a football club is to win trophies."
 
Have Spurs EVER secured a player via payment of a release clause?
Didn’t we just do Porro— the amount if not by triggering the clause. We just did Phillips from Blackburn.
Certain leagues are obligated to put a release clause on every contract and many are ridiculously overpriced.
There are release clauses and genuine release clauses.
They should be part of any smart team’s strategy along with targeting free agents
 
« Paying what it takes » is a ridiculous notion. You pay what the player is worth to you given your limited resources and considering the opportunity costs. That’s the real world.

Everything else is fantasy.
Opportunity cost is the pertinent point. In hindsight, we should have paid an extra 10M for Hazard when Redknapp wanted him. Would have been over the odds and ‘what it takes’, but it would have paid for itself
 
Seen this « not your money » take a lot. Why would that be at all compelling in the real world? The money is the club’s… the one we support… the club will always want to use its resources as effectively as possible.

Any other stance is living in delusion.

Bloke literally spent several posts arguing that it was fine to pay 100m for a 50m player.

Apparently if that seems like a flawed idea then you've been brainwashed by Levy. 🤡
 
The only would be if we were in for another AM, I'm very confident that no one will pay £30-40m though. The value of £30-40m is based on what? 18 months playing for Villareal?

and a year at Real Betis scoring and assisting frequently

and playing with Messi for Argentina - according to his fan club he played better with his mate !

Agree we'd buy another midfielder to replace him - Eze would be good - but we'd need to generate some cash from Lo Celso to upgrade him.

I'd happily take £30m for him but lets start by asking for £40m
 
Seen this « not your money » take a lot. Why would that be at all compelling in the real world? The money is the club’s… the one we support… the club will always want to use its resources as effectively as possible.

Any other stance is living in delusion.
No-one is suggesting that we should pay over the odds for every signing, just now and again for certain players. Is that clear?
 
Back
Top Bottom