Stop with that rationality I am going to get my hopes up like I do every time there is a iffy report on one of the deadwood player leaving.
I have only been burned 249 times before and you know what they say 250th time is the charm!
Last edited:
-
The Fighting Cock is a forum for fans of Tottenham Hotspur Football Club. Here you can discuss Spurs latest matches, our squad, tactics and any transfer news surrounding the club. Registration gives you access to all our forums (including 'Off Topic' discussion) and removes most of the adverts (you can remove them all via an account upgrade). You're here now, you might as well...
Latest Spurs videos from Sky Sports
- Status
Stop with that rationality I am going to get my hopes up like I do every time there is a iffy report on one of the deadwood player leaving.
I have only been burned 249 times before and you know what they say 250th time is the charm!
Damn good money for him with only a year left on his contract. Cheers Papa Poch.
Don’t believe this figure.
Unless they’re smoking something extra strong over in Paris.
Unless they’re smoking something extra strong over in Paris.
Summer 17:
Aurier - PSG > Spurs: 25m euro
Also: PSG wreck the trf market with Neymar & Mbappe deals.
Summer 21:
Aurier - Spurs to PSG: 20m euro.
Inflation, bitchez!!!
Last edited:
20M euros for aurier seems too much tbh 
Wish that offer is true
Wish that offer is true
20M euros for aurier seems too much tbh
It's more their interest - rather than the price-tag - that baffles me......
He left there with a real bad-boy reputation and Poch never seemed entirely convinced by him when he was here.
PSG are also aggressively pursuing Hakimi.
This whole thing doesn't make too much sense, certainly not at the numbers being quoted.
This whole thing doesn't make too much sense, certainly not at the numbers being quoted.
It would be 20 million euros so equating to around 17 million pounds if that seems a bit more achievable.
That’s still fine. Just get him outta here.
The problem with a lot of our deadwood is that we have no use for them. The problem with Sissoko and Aurier is that we do. We need to throw away those crutches because we’re going nowhere with those guys in the side. You could add Winks and Lamela to that list too.
If Aurier stays you know he’s going to start regularly for us next year and we can’t let that happen. Turn that page.
Here's a list of all our transferred players and how much they cost:
S for sell IMO.
Probably would have more question marks to be honest.
S for sell IMO.
Probably would have more question marks to be honest.
| 31/08/2012 | Lloris | 12 | |
| 30/08/2013 | Lamela | 25 | S |
| 23/07/2014 | Davies | 8 | |
| 31/07/2014 | Dier | 4 | |
| 03/02/2015 | Alli | 5 | |
| 08/07/2015 | Alderweireld | 10 | |
| 28/08/2015 | Son | 17 | |
| 31/08/2016 | Sissoko | 30 | S |
| 18/08/2017 | Sanchez | 36 | S |
| 31/08/2017 | Aurier | 23 | S |
| 31/01/2018 | Moura | 22 | |
| 07/06/2019 | Etete | 0.5 | |
| 02/07/2019 | Clarke | 8.5 | ? |
| 02/07/2019 | Ndombele | 42.5 | S |
| 08/08/2019 | Lo Celso | 41 | |
| 08/08/2019 | Sessegnon | 25 | |
| 29/01/2020 | Bergwijn | 26 | ? |
| 28/07/2020 | Devine | 0.5 | |
| 11/08/2020 | Hojbjerg | 15 | |
| 18/08/2020 | Hart | 0 | |
| 30/08/2020 | Doherty | 13.5 | |
| 19/09/2020 | Reguilon | 27.5 | ? |
| 19/09/2020 | Bale | 0 | |
| 02/10/2020 | Vinicius | 2.5 | S |
| 16/10/2020 | Rodon | 11 | ? |
| Total | 405.5 |
take that for aurier, reinvest it in aarons who has plenty of upside.
Exactly even though we "need to sell to buy" I don't care what we get back I just want them out. The longer they stay the more likely it is that Levy fucks it up trying to squeeze too much out of a deal.
I know people will disagree but at this point with guys like Dier, Sanchez, Winks, Lamela, Sissoko, Aurier (and more) it is more important to get rid of them than worrying about what we get for them. We should be fine selling them for nothing if it means they are gone. They are negatives at the club and can only hurt us if they stay.
I think the story has been lost in translation20M euros for aurier seems too much tbh
We pay them 20 mil to take him
Lucky you're not running the club really..... We already stand to have accumulated 50m from sales of 3 of those guys already (inc. the Edwards sell-on). You'd be just as happy giving them away (or as you so 'eloquently' put it; "selling them for nothing". LOL)... This means we have more money to spend, silly.
Good point we should run this group of deadwood back it has worked so well so far or just wait for Daniel to get all this big money for them as he has shown he is willing to do in the past.
I mean if we lose them we might not be able to reach the lofty heights of 7th and the European Conference League again. What ever would we do then?
I didn't say any of that.... True to petulant, miserable form; you said we should just give them all away and I said that was a dumb idea (which of course, it is - As already proven by the outgoing deals we have on the horizon).
Not once did I say keep any of them.
My god, you're a real sulky little bitch aren't you... ?
So glad to have your crying and spinning back. Luckily for me I have never once sulked so as usual you are dead wrong.
Yes I said we should give them away if we aren't able to sell them. We are better off without them than keeping them because nobody will pay Levy's stupid demands.
- Status