And Neville, Lineker and Holt to name but three examples off the top of my head.
Three remainers it seems (that's a joke by the way, please for the love of god take it how it's intended all that read it)
The Fighting Cock is a forum for fans of Tottenham Hotspur Football Club. Here you can discuss Spurs latest matches, our squad, tactics and any transfer news surrounding the club. Registration gives you access to all our forums (including 'Off Topic' discussion) and removes most of the adverts (you can remove them all via an account upgrade). You're here now, you might as well...
And Neville, Lineker and Holt to name but three examples off the top of my head.
Oh look you've answered the question. Turns out you are a secretary after all.
Sorry but that's bollocks ... let's take that to the extreme if I say I believe I heard a girl said yes then whatever happens next is still OK as long as I believe it? ... Sorry but this country is rightly run on evidence and what can be proven, not on what someone believes. The thousands off Spurs fans accused without any evidence already have been made to look bad, they deserve to be cleared far more than Rudiger's 'belief' deserves to be left standing.Because he believes he heard it, if he believes then he should not retract it. The club and the police have done the correct procedure by supporting the victim. The more people call for Rudiger to apologise and all that kind of stuff, the more it makes us look bad.
There is no evidence that the club aren't covering for the perpetrators.There is no evidence he didn't lie either
No wit needed. You posted like a moron and then contradicted what you originally posted 5 minutes later.Such wit.
Did she say no? Did she resist? Did she say anything? Said nothing let you do it, was conscious, no force was used, you wasnt raping her. Then how can you be blamed for anything.Sorry but that's bollocks ... let's take that to the extreme if I say I believe I heard a girl said yes then whatever happens next is still OK as long as I believe it? ... Sorry but this country is rightly run on evidence and what can be proven, not on what someone believes. The thousands off Spurs fans accused without any evidence already have been made to look bad, they deserve to be cleared far more than Rudiger's 'belief' deserves to be left standing.
Your argument seems to be that as long as you 'believe' something you can make any accusation you want against anyone you want and even if that 'belief' is later shown to be without proof that's still OK.
That can't be your position can it?
kingdawson disagreed with my post that i wan't his secretary which must mean that i am his secretary.
I better brush up on my shorthand.
It certainly does. You can claim the media implied ALL Spurs fans are racist, but that didn't actually happen, did it?Fair enough.
How about the media try waiting for the investigation to be completed before implying all Spurs fans are racist as well?
Works both ways.
Who's Linekar??No wit needed. You posted like a moron and then contradicted what you originally posted 5 minutes later.
Thing is youre still talking out your arse. You named Linekar and Neville as 2 of those "articles" but the comments and posts they made were prior to our/the police statement coming out.
Did I? I've on recollection of ever thinking that, but whatever mate. If I did, I was wrong.Maybe you can post one so I don’t have to annoy you later by making you look silly. Like when you though Eriksen was irreplaceable.
He needs a secretary !Whose Linekar??
Wasn't my Linekar, dunno whose it was...Whose Linekar??
What victim??! Christ on a bike......Because he believes he heard it, if he believes then he should not retract it. The club and the police have done the correct procedure by supporting the victim. The more people call for Rudiger to apologise and all that kind of stuff, the more it makes us look bad.
Rudiger believes himself he was the victim, the police and the club support him in that.What victim??! Christ on a bike......
WTF - your argument was that because he 'believed' it he didn't have to retract when the evidence failed to support his belief ... feck knows what this post was all about ...Did she say no? Did she resist? Did she say anything? Said nothing let you do it, was conscious, no force was used, you wasnt raping her. Then how can you be blamed for anything.
He hasn't proven to have lied, people can make any accusations they like but if they are found to be lying then they will be dealt with by the law. That's not found to be so in this case.
Because he believes he heard it, if he believes then he should not retract it. The club and the police have done the correct procedure by supporting the victim. The more people call for Rudiger to apologise and all that kind of stuff, the more it makes us look bad.
It's hardly the most vicious attack on Spurs fans, is it? I can't believe how precious people are being. Like someone else said, this is comparable to the victim mentality of Liverpool fans.What about Barney Ronays tweet further up the page? Chief sports writer for the Guardian.
Like someone else said, this is comparable to the victim mentality of Liverpool fans.
He doesn't though unless the Club want to sue him.WTF - your argument was that because he 'believed' it he didn't have to retract when the evidence failed to support his belief ... feck knows what this post was all about ...
My point which you studiously ignored was that 'belief' has no bearing in law ... unless there is evidence to support that belief it can neither be used as an accusation or as a defence.
Rudiger plain and simple based on all the available evidence was wrong - he should man up and admit it - his belief means frankly feck all against the thousands who don't believe him and who were wrongly accused ... let's not forget Rudiger's a diving scumbag and that's not a belief there's plenty of video evidence to prove that. Sure it was OK to make his accusations, but then it must be equally OK after an investigation to call them bullshit, if that's what we 'believe' ... he didn't lie he just got it wrong, why not have the balls to admit it?