Lamela is much superior footballer to Son in every way and that's not even debateable.
-
The Fighting Cock is a forum for fans of Tottenham Hotspur Football Club. Here you can discuss Spurs latest matches, our squad, tactics and any transfer news surrounding the club. Registration gives you access to all our forums (including 'Off Topic' discussion) and removes most of the adverts (you can remove them all via an account upgrade). You're here now, you might as well...
Latest Spurs videos from Sky Sports
I reckon an italian team like roma would pay about 15-20m for him.
I know he was. But my point was next season is all that matters.
He wouldn't be key or a starting 11 player next season.
I am not complaining about the childish posts. They don't bother me.
It was spursdem that complained about childish posts.
I could than call you a retard too but I am not as hard & tough as you.
I liked the dog roundabout post.
I try to be childish AND funny, not just childish.
Based on what evidence?
Because when he's been fit he has been exclusively a starting key player.
I go back to Isco. Using the Bale scenario. Isco has been phenomenal in his absence, but the fact of the matter is is that Bale starts when he returns.
The same logic will probably be applied with Lamela and Son, as shown this season and last.
Even if not, he would still be a rotation option. Son-Alli-Eriksen combo will not start 55 games next year. It's a squad game and therefore Lamela is still a key player.
Last edited:
I guess we are all a bit childish bar spursdem.I liked the dog roundabout post.
Still.... Evidence > crystal ball syndrome in the REAL world.
...or most importantly not as justified.
You have succeeded beyond your wildest dreams!
Ok. so who do you think would be dropped? & where's your evidence for that?
Ps. I am just given my opinion that he wouldn't be a key starting player.
Nothing wrong in you thinking he would.
I just don't see it myself.
You seem to play the victim card a lot then name other posters and criticise them nearly every post. You're a paradox, that's for sure.
I see why you have the reputation you have.
Ignoring historic evidence and common sense in coming to your rather, ahem, neich "opinion", mind.
Yes, you come across as a lovely humble guy who would be a right laugh & nice to know.
Why do I need evidence for an opinion.
Its just my opinion & prediction that lamela wouldn't be a key starter next season.
If I was to say humans could fly, I wouldn't need evidence because it's an opinion?
I hope you never end up in court. The real world would kick your arse into next week.
My thoughts too. West Ham is also a good shout for the same price, not 35m.
You still refuse to say they have some childish posts as well. Strange.
It was a joke.
Does that bother you? Why the need for that acknowledgement? Playing the victim again?
It seems when you are lost for any reasonable response to what is presented to you about the football you find things to make it all about you.