Come here to laugh at the Fascist, Failing Chavs

  • The Fighting Cock is a forum for fans of Tottenham Hotspur Football Club. Here you can discuss Spurs latest matches, our squad, tactics and any transfer news surrounding the club. Registration gives you access to all our forums (including 'Off Topic' discussion) and removes most of the adverts (you can remove them all via an account upgrade). You're here now, you might as well...

    Get involved!

Latest Spurs videos from Sky Sports

I just noticed that another 20 pages had been filled and was licking my lips on the prospect of them being demoted 10 divisions and Todd Boelhly stating he'll stay "as long as it takes" to get back to the CL again.

Disappointment isn't the word

:porrohands:
 
I just noticed that another 20 pages had been filled and was licking my lips on the prospect of them being demoted 10 divisions and Todd Boelhly stating he'll stay "as long as it takes" to get back to the CL again.

Disappointment isn't the word

:porrohands:

And when you read the thread you found certain types of racism were acceptable.

Like the stuff that Nihal comes out with.
 
LOL... I do...... And 2 = 4 = "many" does it?



Bollocks...... The link is the club she plays for.... The charge is the charge.



That's completely neither here nor there...... The Spurs/Yids and this are nothing alike.

.......If you can't understand the diff then you're wasting both of our time discussing this.
If it is different then why did 94% of 23 thousand people polled held the view that the term could be considered racist. This isn't a split decision 51:49. Nearly 19 out 20 people hold that view in the same country you reside and in the same country this little incident has occurred.

It's different because you're acting on bias. One is an adored chant by the club you love, the other a comment made by a player from a club we all hate.
 
If it is different then why did 94% of 23 thousand people polled held the view that the term could be considered racist. This isn't a split decision 51:49. Nearly 19 out 20 people hold that view in the same country you reside and in the same country this little incident has occurred.

It's different because you're acting on bias. One is an adored chant by the club you love, the other a comment made by a player from a club we all hate.

Fucking hell you really need this spelling out don't you.... One word:

INTENT.


Bored with you two..... I'm out.
 
To my mind the reactions of most on here is most certainly football driven.
Driven by hatred of all things Chelsea.

I'm merely backing a different horse here.

Should stop wasting courts time and money with pish like this.
Nope she needs to learn how to behave. If she was a Spurs player I'd expect better of them. I don't care what colour you are we have had this with Sonny, there's no excuse for racialised language it's low. She going to appear in the next kick it out campaign? Art you are better than this and the Yiddo whataboutery is just silly take off the Aussie blinkers!
 
Of course intent.
Well done for inadvertently telling us 94% of the British population are as dumb as dirt.

'Mate'; your entire shtick for the last few pages has been the epitome of 'internet'............ Peaking with this last line of strawman bullshit.

Get a grip.


(They didn't survey 94% of Britain, you moron.)
 
Nope she needs to learn how to behave. If she was a Spurs player I'd expect better of them. I don't care what colour you are we have had this with Sonny, there's no excuse for racialised language it's low. She going to appear in the next kick it out campaign? Art you are better than this and the Yiddo whataboutery is just silly take off the Aussie blinkers!
I have never disagreed she should have behaved better. Was a stupid and offensive thing to say.
I just shake my head that it is wasting taxpayer money in a courtroom.
 
If it is different then why did 94% of 23 thousand people polled held the view that the term could be considered racist. This isn't a split decision 51:49. Nearly 19 out 20 people hold that view in the same country you reside and in the same country this little incident has occurred.

It's different because you're acting on bias. One is an adored chant by the club you love, the other a comment made by a player from a club we all hate.

"Could be considered".

:vicarioconfused::sonhmm::romerostare::maddisonhmm::ange-hmm::balesnarl::moursad::deledoubt::avbcringe:

I went out with a girl once who managed to find anything I said offensive in some way. I was in love with this girl, I really liked her and fancied her hugely, always tried to say nice things, but everything was flipped on its head. Nothing was taken at face value and we argued a lot over nothing and while it eventually ruined the relationship, the sex was fantastic.

Just sayin... you ain't getting laid for this.
 
If it is different then why did 94% of 23 thousand people polled held the view that the term could be considered racist. This isn't a split decision 51:49. Nearly 19 out 20 people hold that view in the same country you reside and in the same country this little incident has occurred.

It's different because you're acting on bias. One is an adored chant by the club you love, the other a comment made by a player from a club we all hate.
OR....

"Could be considered"

I'm sure we're all aware by now that as fans of a club owned by Levy, the phrases 'could be' and 'considered' basically mean 'no'.
 
kErR iZ bUrYiNg tEh rEaL nEwZ



:davieshmm:
 
Back
Top Bottom