The Fighting Cock is a forum for fans of Tottenham Hotspur Football Club. Here you can discuss Spurs latest matches, our squad, tactics and any transfer news surrounding the club. Registration gives you access to all our forums (including 'Off Topic' discussion) and removes most of the adverts (you can remove them all via an account upgrade). You're here now, you might as well...
Any one got a bable fish handyEskimo a true hipster would know that he isn't a winger but a wide playmaker, or even an Iniesta/Cazorla-style interieur
Eskimo a true hipster would know that he isn't a winger but a wide playmaker, or even an Iniesta/Cazorla-style interieur
Eskimo a true hipster would know that he isn't a winger but a wide playmaker, or even an Iniesta/Cazorla-style interieur
Just because you play on the left/right doesn't mean you have to be a winger. That a myth created by hipsters.
Would love us to get Lallana in the summer, imagine him and Eriksen playing together, they would be our own David-Silva and Nasri combination, able to pass through any team.
I am hoping the next manager drills Lamela and Eriksen a lot (ooeer) to do the same type of thing. IMO we should lock down the middle of the pitch with monsters, and pretty much give the 2 free reign to build up a partnership. I am also convinced we need a solid player between them to make up for their frailties.
A Paulinho, Dembele or Bentaleb would be a good balance, and put monsters behind them like the beast and Capoue to mop up breakdowns.
I am hoping the next manager drills Lamela and Eriksen a lot (ooeer) to do the same type of thing. IMO we should lock down the middle of the pitch with monsters, and pretty much give the 2 free reign to build up a partnership. I am also convinced we need a solid player between them to make up for their frailties.
A Paulinho, Dembele or Bentaleb would be a good balance, and put monsters behind them like the beast and Capoue to mop up breakdowns.
From what I am getting you seem to be favouring the current Peligreini Manchester City system with two midfielders say Sandro and Bentaleb in DM and CM then Eriksen and Lamela pushed further forward in nominal left and right roles but with licence to roam and two strikers up top.
A guess you could call it a modern version of the classic 4-4-2 system but without wingers as such. It would solve our wing play issue in that we could abandon it and give us much greater fire power with two strikers and also give us balance between our creative players and our beasts. Only issue is that against the very best teams our middle might get stretched.
I still disagree with you. Respectfully, this time.
What about a 4-3-3 with one of the three center mids playing a little higher up the pitch? That role might suit Pauli, so we'd have finally figured out what to do with him. Also would eliminate the need for us to go out and spend money on new wingers, as we wouldn't necessarily need them in such a system.
I want defined roles and no square pegs in round holes.
----------------Ade-------------
-Eriksen--Paulinho--Lamela-
--Capoue-------The beast----
NewLB--Vert--Kabs--Walker
Basically a packed 5 man midfield, 3 of which are great at interceptions and challenging 50/50's. I think its the best use of the players we have. The brazilians and Capoue have to be a solid base for our dangerous players. And we would have great depth as Dembele and Bentaleb can play Paulinhos role, and Vlad can play Capoue or the Beasts role. Plus we know at a pinch Dembele and Benty can play DM's too. To have these players as third string cover = a solid team. Holtby and Siggy can be backup for Eriksen or Lamela.
I would certainly play that way against the strongest teams, midfield domiantion has cost us against the top sides this year. On a side note if we don't buy a left back I wouldn't mind using Fryers, has looked good in defence when he has played I know he is not great going forward but I am more convered with a left backs ability to defend than attack, why we stick with Rose?
You guys have watched the ineptitude of our current central midfield to move the ball vertically, and yet you want to call for a further shift to "monsters" and to move our creative talents wide in a 4-3-3? I just simply cannot wrap my brain around why people are still of such a stance. The idea has been absurdly popular for two years now, and after the season we've had I thought it would fizzle out like our attacks once the ball-carrier hits the attacking third, yet it remains.