Ok, im torn between cunting you off straight away for trying to make such a ridiculous point, or just highlighting that what your saying is a bit pointless because it doesn't really have anything to do with what i was saying.
Yes, there was a bit of a blip in the middle of that season, we did beat the gooners though.
that also coincided with our fa cup run, (1 game was played before that run and the final obviously played much later, the other 5 all came within that time.)
We also only lost 7 games all season, rather than consistently.
But, the main point I was making was this. Under Redknapp we apparently played this amazing football, and yeah sure, at times we did, at times we had league winning form.
But, for 2 seasons in a row, our 2nd half of the season form was that of a team fighting relegation. Which is something the Harry Redknapp fans always ignore. The guy just isn't as good as some people make out.
look at the seasons on wikipedia for yourself.
2010–11
2011–12
How people can say we played amazing football blah blah as an argument FOR redknapp and yet ignore that we also played shite just as much... confuses me. Unless they're just ignoring facts to make their point.