The Fighting Cock is a forum for fans of Tottenham Hotspur Football Club. Here you can discuss Spurs latest matches, our squad, tactics and any transfer news surrounding the club. Registration gives you access to all our forums (including 'Off Topic' discussion) and removes most of the adverts (you can remove them all via an account upgrade). You're here now, you might as well...
They're Muslim, so I doubt itI wonder if Man City have faith in Jesus..
Eriksen was starved of the ball because they closed us down repeatedly in midfield. So, in that sense, he was never given a chance to be invisible.
I think a fair observer would find that the game today was dictated by City and that they did indeed play well. Just not well enough.
They're Muslim, so I doubt it
Nailed on too.He did get on the end of a cross but he was offside..
Yes, Eriksen has been playing well, but in a game like this one today when we're under the cosh you might as well take him off. I would have done so after 20 minutes today and replaced him with Son or Winks.You are entirely correct in that Eriksen was invisible tonight.
Your hubris should be tempered by the fact that you have playing this tune throughout Eriksen's most consistent displays for some time.
So you're correct in the same way that a stopped clock is correct. Not as often though.
Happy Birthday anyway.
Well we wouldn't have been so shaky at the back and we do like to play out. It was Wimmer fucking about that led to his yellow and Lloris' obvious discomfort which he didn't manage to shake off.Nope.
Have you not looked at the stats? Our problem was controlling midfield and mounting attacks. I'm not sure how Verts would've changed that.
Isn't that the same score Chelsea won by at Stamford Bridge last season?
I'd say it's as marginal as Kane was for the goal.Sterling is on side. Remember, the camera is at an angle. Aguero is offside though.
Lol, people saying we didn't get hammered or rolled over today.
Shots on target - 7 v 2
Shots - 17 v 6
We got hammered today and were lucky to get a point. You can't say "Yeah, we were lucky, we should have lost that....but we didn't get hammered". They could have won that game by a 3-4 goal margin, especially when Toby went off.
Players did well to cope with that.
Eriksen was starved of the ball because they closed us down repeatedly in midfield. So, in that sense, he was never given a chance to be invisible.
I think a fair observer would find that the game today was dictated by City and that they did indeed play well. Just not well enough.
Yes, Eriksen has been playing well, but in a game like this one today when we're under the cosh you might as well take him off. I would have done so after 20 minutes today and replaced him with Son or Winks.
Eriksen wil play well against Boro though.
The stats don't disprove what I said mate. Kane and Alli were pretty quiet as well for the same reason, in spite of the latter's goal.https://www.whoscored.com/Players/69344
Check out his rating today, compared with his others. Not a great believer in stats, but my eyes thought he was poor tonight.
You're a JAH and a DQ.No, he had plenty of the ball. His passing was poor - he kept passing into their players.
Games like these? Wasn't Chelsea a game like this? Are you so blind that you cannot see that his return to form, and us starting to put teams away 2, 3, or 4 is not a coincidence? I'm sorry but you're simply a WUM and a shit one at that.
Not with you beardy.You're a JAH and a DQ.
Get to fuck you utter pillock. He's been sublime in our run of victories, including beating Chelsea and some tricky away games. You are a plastic cunt of a fan, and a total bore of an attention seeking tosspot. Just fuck off and stick to the Mail online. Ignorant cunt.He goes missing in games like this doesn't he? Was he asking for the ball at any time? Did the game pass him by?
Not with you beardy.