OK I'll be brutally honest - Q9 is horribly written.
"If stands were reintroduced". What, as opposed to the grassy banks we all stand on at the moment? You mean standing areas right?
"I believe that this is a good thing". What is 'this'? Families being offended by fans' conduct? Or the potential reintroduction of stands? If you mean the latter, then you can't say it is a good thing, because it hasn't happened. You'd have to say it would be a good thing.
"I prefer seating as it is more comfortable". More comfortable than what? Squatting? Hopping? You need to be unambiguous. Also what about if somebody prefers seating as it enables them to avoid certain types of fans, rather than because of any comfort issues? Then how would they answer the question?
Q10 is a bit better, though please don't call us "Tottenham FC". There is no such thing. Call us Spurs, Tottenham, Tottenham Hotspur, or Tottenham Hotspur FC.
Q11 is not very clear. Are you talking about these parties being active in stopping Yid chants in their own immediate spheres of influence (stadiums) or in general throughout the footballing world?
Q12 - more or less likely than what? The current situation? The amount that I currently use Yid chants? This makes very little sense, particularly for the home and away game ones. Would be much clearer to use a scale from very unlikely to very likely. Or you could put contrasting pairs at either end of the same scale.
I've done the survey, but if you're serious about using this as a research tool for a dissertation I'd strongly suggest that you read up on the basics of good practice in questionnaire writing, and do some thorough proof-reading and sanity checking.
Sorry to be harsh on you!