Levy would have spoken to his agent?That's not a problem, if he knows we want him, which I'm confident we do.
The Fighting Cock is a forum for fans of Tottenham Hotspur Football Club. Here you can discuss Spurs latest matches, our squad, tactics and any transfer news surrounding the club. Registration gives you access to all our forums (including 'Off Topic' discussion) and removes most of the adverts (you can remove them all via an account upgrade). You're here now, you might as well...
Levy would have spoken to his agent?That's not a problem, if he knows we want him, which I'm confident we do.
The problem, however, was that Tottenham did not bid. At no point this summer did Spurs chairman Daniel Levy make contact with Everton or attempt to do a deal for the 23-year-old.
Why Ross Barkley rejected Chelsea transfer | Daily Mail Online
What sort of cognitive dissonance does it take to have a 'legendary' player like Drogba fire you to multiple league titles (and a Champions League win) but you still don't rethink your racism? Twat.Forgot this....
What sort of cognitive dissonance does it take to have a 'legendary' player like Drogba fire you to multiple league titles (and a Champions League win) but you still don't rethink your racism? Twat.
That's reminiscent of a Shearer recount of a Spurs performance there's a lot more going on than the obvious. Irony indeedProbably the same thing that revolved around black men who capture, "owned" and sold slaves.
Irony is lost on many
And it's on record that our players and Poch have spoken to him too.Levy would have spoken to his agent?
That's reminiscent of a Shearer recount of a Spurs performance there's a lot more going on than the obvious. Irony indeed
Doesn't surprise meI don't know if it's just me, but I can't make sense of what you're saying?
Doesn't surprise me
That fact wasn't stated in your original post but in reference to snarky responses speaking volumes, reducing the intent and impact of the Atlantic slave trade to 'irony' that black Africans participated to detrimental effects displays a willing lack of insight.That snarky response speaks volumes though, so I assume you disagree with the absolute fact that freed black slaves became slavers themselves ?
That fact wasn't stated in your original post but in reference to snarky responses speaking volumes, reducing the intent and impact of the Atlantic slave trade to 'irony' that black Africans participated to detrimental effects displays a willing lack of insight.
↑How did we end up talking about black slavery on a Ross Barkley thread?
Wasn't at all out of context your irony comment was intently provocative and in unnecessary in response to a perfectly reasonable query about a specific incident involving a Chelsea fan. Insult all you want if you can explain so concisely the effect on victims of racial behaviour (although you haven't) then there is nothing ironic about it. As stated willling lack of insightBullshit. You're being an idiot for no reason.
The fact is, victims of racial behaviour can easily become aggressors, as racism and ignorance are not mutually exclusive. The same men who wished for a route out of slavery were quite ready to perpetuate it. That is, quite literally, irony.
Your hyperbolic response completely justifies the title of idiot in this respect, btw - the fact that you've taken a small comment completely out of context in order to patronise.
How did we end up talking about black slavery on a Ross Barkley thread?
How did we end up talking about black slavery on a Ross Barkley thread?