To kick off
Vicario across 28 games.
Averages 6.93 with my wider sourced ratings system. Pure forum 7.49.
Vicario across 28 games.
Averages 6.93 with my wider sourced ratings system. Pure forum 7.49.
-
The Fighting Cock is a forum for fans of Tottenham Hotspur Football Club. Here you can discuss Spurs latest matches, our squad, tactics and any transfer news surrounding the club. Registration gives you access to all our forums (including 'Off Topic' discussion) and removes most of the adverts (you can remove them all via an account upgrade). You're here now, you might as well...
Latest Spurs videos from Sky Sports
Royal across 9 starts in games 5.83 compared to the pure forum of 6.16, 11 of which will be sub appearances so not a like for like comparison.
Vdv across 19 games 7.24 compared to pure forum 7.64.
Romero across 21 starts 6.87, pure forum 7.20 across 22 games, one may be as a sub?
Udogie across 24 starts 6.73, pure forum 7.02 also across 24.
In the sense that a 20-year total solitary confinement sentence might be interesting.Interesting
In the sense that a 20-year total solitary confinement sentence might be interesting.
Wayne Couzens I hope!
Bissouma across 17 starts averages 6.46 compared to pure forum of 6.60 across 18, maybe the extra one being a sub appearance.
Maddison across 16 starts averages 7.50 compared to 7.35 on the pure forum across 18 appearances, 2 of which may be as a sub.
Kulusevski across 23 at 6.52, pure forum 6.41 across 27 so probably 4 sub appearances.
Richarlison 6.37 across 20 starts, 6.32 on pure forum across 25 appearances 5 of which may be as a sub.
Son across 22 starts 6.67 compared to the pure forum of 6.66 across 24, 2 of which may have been as a sub.
Sarr across 18 starts 6.76, on pure forum 6.71 across 23 appearances, 5 of which might be as a sub.
Does that mean the forum ratings are a waste of time aswell. ?
Porro 6.99 across 25 starts, pure forum 7.15 also across 25.
What are you going to do, send your data to Ange Postecoglou?
Don't be ridiculous, it's just a comparison of opinion. Plenty of people participate in ratings both on here and other platforms. Admin considered it worthwhile and significant numbers contribute. There is no point to it unless a final table is produced to indicate who our best player was, the forum system does that ongoing, I just produced mine and compared it. There are factors which may affect accuracy like sub appearances ( which I don't include ) and rogue ratings such as all 10s or 1s which I also don't include but admin may let a few slip through, I don't know.
Other factors are anger and euphoria affecting ratings which I try to minimise by combining neutral ratings from other sources.
Why not criticise the admin system ongoing when the accumulative season ratings change each week. ?