The BBC have found a new way to bash us and to big up pretty much everyone else.
Premier League stats: Harry Kane, Patrice Evra, Mohamed Salah, Alan Pardew
Premier League stats: Harry Kane, Patrice Evra, Mohamed Salah, Alan Pardew
The Fighting Cock is a forum for fans of Tottenham Hotspur Football Club. Here you can discuss Spurs latest matches, our squad, tactics and any transfer news surrounding the club. Registration gives you access to all our forums (including 'Off Topic' discussion) and removes most of the adverts (you can remove them all via an account upgrade). You're here now, you might as well...
So Woolwich and Chelsea pass us because they don't have a decent striker that they rely on to win points for them...The BBC have found a new way to bash us and to big up pretty much everyone else.
Premier League stats: Harry Kane, Patrice Evra, Mohamed Salah, Alan Pardew
What a load of old cunt. It fucking pains me that my licence fee goes towards horseshit like this.The BBC have found a new way to bash us and to big up pretty much everyone else.
Premier League stats: Harry Kane, Patrice Evra, Mohamed Salah, Alan Pardew
So Woolwich and Chelsea pass us because they don't have a decent striker that they rely on to win points for them...
...and also conveniently ignoring the notion that if Kane didn't score those goals, NO ONE else would have!What a load of old cunt. It fucking pains me that my licence fee goes towards horseshit like this.
Just a complete and utter waste of time. So if Kane didn't exist Poch would pick ten players every game and Dele, Dembele, Eriksen Son & Lamela would play through-balls into a vacant void of an area where a Kane would have been. What a load of old cunt.The BBC have found a new way to bash us and to big up pretty much everyone else.
Premier League stats: Harry Kane, Patrice Evra, Mohamed Salah, Alan Pardew
Just a complete and utter waste of time. So if Kane didn't exist Poch would pick ten players every game and Dele, Dembele, Eriksen Son & Lamela would play through-balls into a vacant void of an area where a Kane would have been. What a load of old cunt.
The BBC have found a new way to bash us and to big up pretty much everyone else.
Premier League stats: Harry Kane, Patrice Evra, Mohamed Salah, Alan Pardew
He also hits Taxi drivers if they're wearing a Spurs hat... does that cement his place in the England team even more then?Thank fuck that this shit is hidden behind a paywall...
Edit: It's actually not...basically says that he should play for England because he's nice to sick kids and is not afraid to face up to the press after an embarrassing defeat...OK that's actually a great reason why he should be on the plane...
Says the guy getting upset about us getting upset.seriously guys, you need to find something a little more worthwhile to be upset about.
The thing is they're not trying to point out how 'effective and worthwhile' Kane is; they're reinforcing Pep's narrative that we are the 'Harry Kane team'.Harry Kane is a valuable, effective and worthwhile player shocker!
....you probably just beat most of us to it!!In fairness...there's not much difference between Llorente and a "vacant void of an area"
I'm not upset about anything, I'm pointing out that you are - different thing altogether.Says the guy getting upset about us getting upset.
The thing is they're not trying to point out how 'effective and worthwhile' Kane is; they're reinforcing Pep's narrative that we are the 'Harry Kane team'.
You objected to someone's objection. You may not characterise whatever motivated you to take the time out of your day to achieve something so profoundly unremarkable as 'upset', but that's how it came across to me.I'm not upset about anything, I'm pointing out that you are - different thing altogether.
In your mind they are.............
I think medically its known as paranoia
different thing altogether.
so pointing out that people are going overboard is a complaint that indicates an objection is it?You objected to someone's objection. You may not characterise whatever motivated you to take the time out of your day to achieve something so profoundly unremarkable as 'upset', but that's how it came across to me.
EDIT: What's your take on this BBC graphic from the start of the current campaign? Bias or paranoia?
Clearly not.It doesn't bother me at all.
I'm no more 'on the offensive' than you were with the comment that triggered this discussion.You put your opinions up for comment, and when they get commented on, you go on the offensive.
It's the BBC's graphic, so we're not supposed to do anything. But, I absolutely do think we should have been represented in a graphic of title-contenders, given our recent performances, and given the fact that many saw us as one of the favourites for the title.They have all won the title since we have and are all premier teams, what are we supposed to do, demand representation on the basis that we last won it 57 years ago?
so pointing out that people are going overboard is a complaint that indicates an objection is it?
I don't object to you doing it, if you want to look a bit of a charlie - knock yourself out. It doesn't bother me at all. You put your opinions up for comment, and when they get commented on, you go on the offensive. Couple that and your rationale and it comes across as paranoia.
What do you want me to do at the graphic, bleat and cry that we are not on it? They have all won the title since we have and are all premier teams, what are we supposed to do, demand representation on the basis that we last won it 57 years ago?
To be perfectly honest, I am more than happy for us to stay under the radar and out of peoples faces.
But if this wailing about how everyone hates us is what stokes your fire, then go right ahead