Dan Kilpatrick saying Lo Celso likely to miss Sundays game.
-
The Fighting Cock is a forum for fans of Tottenham Hotspur Football Club. Here you can discuss Spurs latest matches, our squad, tactics and any transfer news surrounding the club. Registration gives you access to all our forums (including 'Off Topic' discussion) and removes most of the adverts (you can remove them all via an account upgrade). You're here now, you might as well...
Latest Spurs videos from Sky Sports
Seems to be a random selection of injuries to me
Quite clearly says hamstring. He's out again with his hamstring
So what?
So if it's not his hamstring, it'll just be something else. As all the facts prove.
The point is, why keep putting up with a player who can get injury on any part of his body in his sleep.It is is hamstring...
Jesus christ
Today it's his hamstring. Surgery may fix it, but then he'll just injure something else the next time. And the time after that. The guy barely fucking plays and still manages to get injured.
FML, I shouldn't have had to write all that.
Full hamstring replacement? Just one or both?
Has he had his issues?
Yes.
But to single him out when our squad is dropping like flies with hamstrings isn't really fair. Maybe it is a precaution by Ange to make sure he isn't out long term.
Yea, exactly that...
No point of holding on to player who is useless most of the time. And OF COURSE he also lets the team down in the moment when we would have needed him the most - when both Madders AND Kulusevski were out of the game.
There is also opportunity cost related to squad spots - if you keep someone who is not usable mostly and is not getting any better anymore at this age, it is just wasted chance. When we could in fact give the place in squad for someone who could potentially get better in the future.
I get that you are trying to be funny and all...
But look at his injury record. Not just hammy - everything. Now look at how much he has played this season, and how many games he has been sidelined. To save you some time, I can tell you -
21 EPL games so far
6 games unavailable directly due to injury ; 3 different ones during this season and 4th in the summer, from which he seemed to be recovering during first rounds
5 games unused sub after returning from different injuries
4 games very limited playing time after returning from different injuries
that is FIFTEEN (!) games from 21.
From reminder he has had 4 starts and 2 substitution appearances.
21 games mean 1890 minutes of EPL football played out of which GLC has played 411
23% of overall minutes.
Nope. Kulu at 10.So that means even IF Maddison can start *big if
One of Skipp/Hojb has to play…
If Maddison can’t start…. Both play.
Bentancur/madders/deki midfield for me and the same front three as was against Utd. The only way I’d change from that is put Hojbjerg in and Deki in for Johnson.
Not with Barca for sure; they never really wanted him, despite what people said. They would have taken him on loan without obligation to buy and us covering part of wages most likely. That is basically charity.
I hope there is someone who is actually willing to buy him for like 15 million (absolute max we could dream of) either in Jan or summer.
No fucking glee. Just pointing out the fact. I see you are not taking it well, are you?
Or does it work in the way that people like you who always have been wrong about him can come out and brag how they were always right after spell of 2 or 3 good games, but when normal situation returns, and people that have been right 99% of the time cannot point that out? Well, that is awfully convenient for some.
I can honestly say that there was spark of hope in me for a moment, regarding him. And now I feel that I'm being let down, so it is disappointment talking here. Why shouldn't I take it out on people that were gloating about me being wrong?
Maybe time has come to admit from you as well, that GLC always has and always will be useless for this club and is 2nd biggest transfer flop this club has seen?
Ange press conference before Everton i think
I remember that his answer about any players being available, was "no, not yet" or "not for this game" or smth along those lines.
Which does not mean that "not for this game but he will be ready for next game" - this other half of the sentence is added on in one's head.
So as of now we don't have solid indication of his return time.
All goes in the pot.