England squad

  • The Fighting Cock is a forum for fans of Tottenham Hotspur Football Club. Here you can discuss Spurs latest matches, our squad, tactics and any transfer news surrounding the club. Registration gives you access to all our forums (including 'Off Topic' discussion) and removes most of the adverts (you can remove them all via an account upgrade). You're here now, you might as well...

    Get involved!

Latest Spurs videos from Sky Sports

Maddison is a peripheral because he is a 10 and we have Jude Bellingham and Phil Foden who are both better tens than him. You can't play multiple tens, it doesn't work. The concept of a workman CM who makes life easier for teammates is not even close to unique to English football.

The culture around the England team lately has been absolutely fine, with a really nice feel-good atmosphere which has led us to a WC semi-final, a Euros final (lost on pens) and a quarter-final loss against France while having more possession, more shots, more shots on target and generally being the better team. We lost, but the game was good and there were none of these 'England play limited footie' myths.

We probably won't win the Euros. Winning tournaments is tough, some incredible sides have failed to do it. But we'll absolutely compete and we absolutely have a solid a chance as pretty much anybody does. Why anyone would want to deny that having seen us in recent years I really don't know.
Yep I'm going to call you Micro man.....The atmosphere in Southgates team is not what im talking about. Sorry D we really cant have this conversation. Ask Le Perisien he can maybe explain it to you better than I can.:ange-facepalm:
 
Bastoni. Ruben Dias. Rudiger. Van Dijk.

All world class ball-playing centrebacks.

Edit: obviously only one of them does it for city!

None of these players are as good on the ball as Stones. Some are better at plenty of other things, but if you're talking ball-playing defender from the position, he's the best on the planet. To the point where he was playing at the base of midfield under Pep Guardiola for large parts of last season (Incl Inter, where again .. standing ovation) and was brilliant.
 
Bastoni. Ruben Dias. Rudiger. Van Dijk.

All world class ball-playing centrebacks.

Edit: obviously only one of them does it for city!

He's better than Bastoni, in my opinion. Though I'm just more familiar with Stones. Completely different to Dias, but is considerably better on the ball. Too different to Rudiger who is far more physical. Van Dijk has been immense and is having a good season, but because of their ages I'd still take Stones over him.

Personally I think van de Ven, Stones and Saliba are the best in the Premier League. Romero right up there too.
 
Yep I'm going to call you Micro man..... :ange-facepalm:

The 'macro' ((????) you're suggesting is just untrue. You're talking about myths that you think are unique to England which .. aren't. There's nothing unique about our footballing culture anymore that isn't present in most of Europe.

The fact Lewis Dunk and Conor Gallagher make the NT prove nothing other than like most national-teams we have tender spots and less accomplished footballers found their way in as they perform a role. Dunk probably wouldn't be there if Ben White, who isn't very good but is very European in style, didn't deny a call up.
 
It's not an issue for France Shady because it isn't central to the way they think about football. There's always been Basil Boli. It is central to English football identity and you can see it in the way it holds fast to Henderson and Gallagher whilst Maddison is a peripheral. I'd not get hung up on what bookmakers say, and I've made zero attempts to contend their machinations.

Finally but probably most important culture and history matter.The odd head-space the mens team assume with its weird fans, it's relationship with its media( I'll never forget dignified old Roy Hodgson telling them in his resignation press conference they were at the heart of all that was wrong....the wankers laughed at him BUT HE WAS IS...RIGHT) being halfway through the book on playing through the thirds won't fix any of this. It's nice the fans have hope but I suspect they have a bit more waiting to do yet. I don't see Harry Kane being the one that ends the grail quest.

I'm not talking about the bookmakers, I'm referencing my own opinion.

This is a dated argument, England used to prirotise runners in their team particularly in midfield - look at the players England are producing from grass roots, focused on technical ability and being calm under pressure and if you need proof look at the U21 team further down - it's an absolute sea change from when we used to churn out teams say 20 years ago.

I agree with you that certain players shouldn't be picked but that's a manager problem, not a player problem, for all the Henderson's and Gallagher's you forget players like Eze, Mainoo and you can go even further down, Alex Scott, Archie Gray, Cole Palmer, Rico Lewis, Dewsbury hall, Angel Gomes, Alfie Devine etc...technical ability is now being prioritised over just pure athletes.

TBH these sort of players were being produced in the past, it's just that we were so far behind what the rest of the world were doing in terms of development that most of them couldn't break through because they were seen as too small and they'd get eaten up in the Prem...that's when we prioritised physicality over technical ability, only the exceptional players like Scholes, Carrick, Joe Cole broke through but they were forced to play in wide positions or not be picked consistently, we are so far away from those days.

I dunno England aren't as far away as you make them out to be, a spot kick away from winning the Euro's, a QF exit at the hands of France because of a missed pen, but that's on the manager, a better coach gets far more out of these players and a better coach utilises each player's strength to their maximum capabilities, Southgate just cannot do that.
 
I'm not talking about the bookmakers, I'm referencing my own opinion.

This is a dated argument, England used to prirotise runner in their team particularly in midfield - look at the players England are producing from grass roots, focused on technical ability and being calm under pressure and if you need proof look at the U21 team further down - it's an absolute sea change from when we used to churn out teams say 20 years ago.

I agree with you that certain players shouldn't be picked but that's a manager problem, not a player problem, for all the Henderson's and Gallagher's you forget players like Eze, Mainoo and you can go even further down, Alex Scott, Archie Gray, Cole Palmer, Rico Lewis, Dewsbury hall, Angel Gomes, Alfie Devine etc...technical ability is now being prioritised over just pure athletes.

TBH these sort of players were being produced in the past, it's just that we were so far behind what the rest of the world were doing in terms of development that most of them couldn't break through because they were seen as too small and they'd get eaten up in the Prem...that's when we prioritised physicality over technical ability, only the exceptional players like Scholes, Carrick, Joe Cole broke through but they were forced to play in wide positions or not be picked consistently, we are so far away from those days.

I dunno England aren't as far away as you make them out to be, a spot kick away from winning the Euro's, a QF exit at the hands of France because of a missed pen, but that's on the manager, a better coach gets far more out of these players and a better coach utilises each player's strength to their maximum capabilities, Southgate just cannot do that.
We have always had technically good players I can name you a list just along constantly overlooked for even earlier periods Letissier /Charlton Palmer springs to mind. The deep belief in function over flair will always see Rice and Philips in a pivot over the progressive player. That conservatism is at the heart of who we are. This is the point Im making over the Maddison for Bellingham chat Foreign managers from Wenger to Pep and Klopp have begun to change this. But it's more than the bad luck you indicate in hiding behind spot kicks. We should never have got there against Italy but our inherent footballing culture and the fear of failure and what our public and media do in the wake of this is a very real issue. No matter how much we wish it was not the case. I genuinely wonder about the individuals who went to the effort of shitting in a tupperware box and mailling it to Harry Kane.Have a good night.
 
We have always had technically good players I can name you a list just along constantly overlooked for even earlier periods Henderson/Charlton Palmer springs to mind. The deep belief in function over flair will always see Rice and Philips in a pivot over the progressive player. That conservatism is at the heart of who we are. This is the point Im making over the Maddison for Bellingham chat Foreign managers from Wenger to Pep and Klopp have begun to change this. But it's more than the bad luck you indicate in hiding behind spot kicks. We should never have got there against Italy but our inherent footballing culture and the fear of failure and what our public and media do in the wake of this is a very real issue. No matter how much we wish it was not the case. Have a good night.

That's not who we are, that's who Southgate is. Southgate doesn't define a football nation, literally everyone has been asking for him to release the handbrake and change it up. You're not gonna find many people in this country actually believe that a Rice/Gallagher/Hendo double pivot is the key to any sort of success because people have eyes.

It's not even defined in English culture anymore, look at how Lee Carsley managed his U21 team last Summer, he played a false 9 with little Angel Gomes a the anchor in his midfield ffs lol
 
Maddison is a peripheral because he is a 10 and we have Jude Bellingham and Phil Foden who are both better tens than him. You can't play multiple tens, it doesn't work.

Maddison plays as an 8 for us and often did for Leicester. You could easily accommodate Maddison, Bellingham and Foden as R8, L8 and IRF in a 433.

But you would require someone with better positional discipline and game reading than Rice for the 6.
 
Maddison plays as an 8 for us and often did for Leicester. You could easily accommodate Maddison, Bellingham and Foden as R8, L8 and IRF in a 433.

But you would require someone with better positional discipline and game reading than Rice for the 6.

I mean sure if we had Rodri we could probably make it work. But we don’t, and nor frankly do most countries.

With what we have, playing two of Maddison/Bellingham/Foden in the midfield won’t work. We need Rice in there, he’s by far our most quality ‘engine’ footballer with drive who wins the ball back and can threaten going forward if allowed to.

Even if we had that 6, I’d still have Rice in there next to Bellingham rather than Maddison. Too good to not start.
 
The culture around the England team lately has been absolutely fine, with a really nice feel-good atmosphere
iu

We probably won't win the Euros.
You bearish now? So the Brazil game DID have some effect...
 
iu


You bearish now? So the Brazil game DID have some effect...

That useless twat has never been a real part of the squad and never should be.

Not really. I think we’ve got a great chance but having a great chance doesn’t translate to winning anything. Probabilities when it comes to winning international trophies are low.
 
Last edited:
I'm not talking about the bookmakers, I'm referencing my own opinion.

This is a dated argument, England used to prirotise runners in their team particularly in midfield - look at the players England are producing from grass roots, focused on technical ability and being calm under pressure and if you need proof look at the U21 team further down - it's an absolute sea change from when we used to churn out teams say 20 years ago.

I agree with you that certain players shouldn't be picked but that's a manager problem, not a player problem, for all the Henderson's and Gallagher's you forget players like Eze, Mainoo and you can go even further down, Alex Scott, Archie Gray, Cole Palmer, Rico Lewis, Dewsbury hall, Angel Gomes, Alfie Devine etc...technical ability is now being prioritised over just pure athletes.

TBH these sort of players were being produced in the past, it's just that we were so far behind what the rest of the world were doing in terms of development that most of them couldn't break through because they were seen as too small and they'd get eaten up in the Prem...that's when we prioritised physicality over technical ability, only the exceptional players like Scholes, Carrick, Joe Cole broke through but they were forced to play in wide positions or not be picked consistently, we are so far away from those days.

I dunno England aren't as far away as you make them out to be, a spot kick away from winning the Euro's, a QF exit at the hands of France because of a missed pen, but that's on the manager, a better coach gets far more out of these players and a better coach utilises each player's strength to their maximum capabilities, Southgate just cannot do that.
Angel Gomes never gets a look in but he was outstanding in the euro under 21 win. Playing in front of the defence. Not surprised if someone snaps him up from Lille.
 
Angel Gomes never gets a look in but he was outstanding in the euro under 21 win. Playing in front of the defence. Not surprised if someone snaps him up from Lille.

He plays outside England. Southgate required about two years of Bellingham tearing it up in Germany to bring him in. Tomori still won’t get a look in over a Dunk.

Southgate doesn’t care about players outside the Prem, unless you already built your reputation there or you’re utterly exceptional.
 
Maddison plays as an 8 for us and often did for Leicester. You could easily accommodate Maddison, Bellingham and Foden as R8, L8 and IRF in a 433.

But you would require someone with better positional discipline and game reading than Rice for the 6.
I rate Foden very highly but it is a fact that he has never really done it for England. Hard to leave him out , prob end up on the left . I would think Grealish will be sweating over a squad place at the moment.
As it stands I would think he’s watching it on tv.
 
I rate Foden very highly but it is a fact that he has never really done it for England. Hard to leave him out , prob end up on the left . I would think Grealish will be sweating over a squad place at the moment.
As it stands I would think he’s watching it on tv.

Grealish will return from injury, take Doku’s starting spot sharpish and finish the season strongly as their preferred LW.

Will make the squad.
 
Seeing as the likes of Gallagher and Henderson aren't good enough against the better sides, and Mainoo still lacks experience, I wonder if it might be worth going back to the 5 at the back Southgate used to love. Playing that way eliminates the midfield issue, though Bellingham would have to be more disciplined than the role he plays at Real Madrid. But it gives you extra strength in defence and also would allow you to bring Trent into the side, who regardless of what you think of him as a defender, is second to only De Bruyne in the Premier League in regards to what he can do on the ball.

Walker, Stones and Maguire at centre-back with Trent and Shaw playing as attacking wing-backs. Rice and Bellingham in midfield. Then any two from Foden, Saka, Maddison, Rashford, Grealish, Gordon and Palmer depending on form, fitness and what you want against certain opposition. Kane obviously up top. The biggest issues with that are you would have to play Bellingham deeper, and 5 at the back can become extremely negative if your wing-backs get pushed back. The positives are you can get TAA in the side who brings creativity, and you also have Walker's pace in the centre of defence which is a massive plus.
 
Last edited:
Seeing as the likes of Gallagher and Henderson aren't good enough against the better sides, and Mainoo still lacks experience, I wonder if it might be worth going back to the 5 at the back Southgate used to love. Playing that way eliminates the midfield issue, though Bellingham would have to be more disciplined than the role he plays at Real Madrid. But it gives you extra strength in defence and also would allow you to bring Trent into the side, who regardless of what you think of him as a defender, is second to only De Bruyne in the Premier League in regards to what he can do on the ball.

Walker, Stones and Maguire at centre-back with Trent and Shaw playing as attacking wing-backs. Rice and Bellingham in midfield. Then any two from Foden, Saka, Maddison, Rashford, Grealish, Gordon and Palmer depending on form, fitness and what you want against certain opposition. Kane obviously up top. The biggest issues with that are you would have to play Bellingham deeper, and 5 at the back can become extremely negative if your wing-backs get pushed back. The positives are you can get TAA in the side who brings creativity, and you also have Walker's pace in the centre of defence which is a massive plus.

5 at the back under southgate

sick team america GIF
 
Seeing as the likes of Gallagher and Henderson aren't good enough against the better sides, and Mainoo still lacks experience, I wonder if it might be worth going back to the 5 at the back Southgate used to love. Playing that way eliminates the midfield issue, though Bellingham would have to be more disciplined than the role he plays at Real Madrid. But it gives you extra strength in defence and also would allow you to bring Trent into the side, who regardless of what you think of him as a defender, is second to only De Bruyne in the Premier League in regards to what he can do on the ball.

Walker, Stones and Maguire at centre-back with Trent and Shaw playing as attacking wing-backs. Rice and Bellingham in midfield. Then any two from Foden, Saka, Maddison, Rashford, Grealish, Gordon and Palmer depending on form, fitness and what you want against certain opposition. Kane obviously up top. The biggest issues with that are you would have to play Bellingham deeper, and 5 at the back can become extremely negative if your wing-backs get pushed back. The positives are you can get TAA in the side who brings creativity, and you also have Walker's pace in the centre of defence which is a massive plus.

He'd just drop an attacking player........ We've already seen it.

Gary's 343 had Rice & Phillips in MF...... And beige worker-boy Mount as a winger too.

Fucking awful.
 
Back
Top Bottom