I disagree, not if the aforementioned data doesn't support the assertion you can't
You should post this data if you expect to have the slightest bit of credibility in this discussion.
The Fighting Cock is a forum for fans of Tottenham Hotspur Football Club. Here you can discuss Spurs latest matches, our squad, tactics and any transfer news surrounding the club. Registration gives you access to all our forums (including 'Off Topic' discussion) and removes most of the adverts (you can remove them all via an account upgrade). You're here now, you might as well...
I disagree, not if the aforementioned data doesn't support the assertion you can't
Why would the same media system that was gung ho for vaccination be invested in any disclosure that then makes them look like cunts?I’m pretty open-minded about this and I would want to see the data that shows a huge increase. But I also can’t figure out the motive to hide this if it exists? Like, who benefits if there was a spike in players dropping dead, and people don’t realize there’s a spike?
It’s 100% this. If the data shows that players are dropping dead at a much more impactful rate, show your work.You should post this data if you expect to have the slightest bit of credibility in this discussion.
You don’t think the media could flip the script and tell everyone how big, bad Pharma is killing our sports heroes? The spike in views/clicks would be immense and they would do that in a second.Why would the same media system that was gung ho for vaccination be invested in any disclosure that then makes them look like cunts?
You have a link to that data?
Thats the role/grift of the alternative and online media. Pfizer for instance would pull their funding of CNN immediately if they made on field deaths a big thing. So we end up with a polarised war between the two with the truth somewhere in the middle.You don’t think the media could flip the script and tell everyone how big, bad Pharma is killing our sports heroes? The spike in views/clicks would be immense and they would do that in a second.
It’s my experience my friend
Sure it does"Experience" doesn't count for a great deal in such a context.
Sure it does
My experience and memory is meaningful to me.Not unless you know of and remember every incident in world football; then it's just hollow anecdotal pre and post covid.
I'm sure you'll just reply disagreeing; but to save any further back and forth......
Go ahead; quantify your "experience" (whatever that means) for us in a meaningful way.
Ok, so bearing in mind that Pfizer is public and we can see their financials…how much money does CNN get from them? And does BioNtech also give money to CNN? And what about the hundreds of other media outlets that compete with CNN? Wouldn’t they run a story about this?Thats the role/grift of the alternative and online media. Pfizer for instance would pull their funding of CNN immediately if they made on field deaths a big thing. So we end up with a polarised war between the two with the truth somewhere in the middle.
It's entirely possible that you might be right. Afterall, neither side of the debate has provided evidence. However, you basing and standing by your opinion on "well I don't remember people dieing on the pitch before the covid jab existed" makes for an easy target of ridicule.My experience and memory is meaningful to me.
It's entirely possible that you might be right. Afterall, neither side of the debate has provided evidence. However, you basing and standing by your opinion on "well I don't remember people dieing on the pitch before the covid jab existed" makes for an easy target of ridicule.
Notice, I’ve not once said it’s connected to covid JabsIt's entirely possible that you might be right. Afterall, neither side of the debate has provided evidence. However, you basing and standing by your opinion on "well I don't remember people dieing on the pitch before the covid jab existed" makes for an easy target of ridicule.
Well done. You really , REALLY didn't need to. And you've still not provided any evidence.Notice, I’ve not once said it’s connected to covid Jabs
Why did I?Well done. You really , REALLY didn't need to.
The large mainstream news are all beholden to significant corporate sponsorship. Thats a fairly monolithic system as the markets are all co-dependent. The independent new online media is only beholden to subscription. If you cant see that basic division of the cake I cant really help you.Ok, so bearing in mind that Pfizer is public and we can see their financials…how much money does CNN get from them? And does BioNtech also give money to CNN? And what about the hundreds of other media outlets that compete with CNN? Wouldn’t they run a story about this?