I like you fishy, you know that but sorry old bean the teams you got in your group this season are miles off what they used to be. I'll cut you some slack regarding PSG as I don't think anyone knows what PSG are right now, certainly, they are a club on a course correct, I think it's fair to say they have changed direction from previous years regarding players they are targeting but they are still spending shed loads.
But aside from that, the other Clubs are pure reputational and are poor teams today a mile off where they used to be. Even us under Conte (so utterly shite) knew we had a team to beat Milan last year, it was his nail in the coffin that shifted the entire fanbase to want him out the door the way he approached both games against them and I'd argue they are worse this year!
You finished BOTTOM of the group and won ONE game, in no other measure this is really bad!!
We did but, and I know you move onto to it below, injuries absolutely knackered us. Your own team has had it's struggles because of the unprecedented injury list and you've not had as many fixtures to play (not a dig at all, just the way it is). So, would I be as sanguine had we finished bottom without this injury list? No, I'd be pretty pissed off. Dismissing Milan and Dortmund is pretty harsh if you ask me. They showed to me that they're at least as good as a Brighton or maybe a Man Utd of this season. We did finish bottom, but we had 4 close games where luck didn't go our way. Couple off the woodwork go in, or the handball law being the same as it is in the PL and we're on 8-9pts and going through to the next stage. We didn't get humiliated in any game and managed a humiliation of PSG. Had Woolwich had our group and our injuries they would have struggled too.
Of course, getting injuries etc affects the team and like us you've had loads to deal with and to important players. You also have brought some of it on yourselves too, as you failed to do your homework on Tonali. But injuries are part of the game and lady luck always plays a part (when Poch was with us he only got to play his "best team" ONCE!).
Thing with Tonali is that neither Milan, nor our scouts had any idea about his illness. Understandably so. For what it's worth I'm not sure we've missed Tonali as much as we have Botman, or Wilson, or Barnes, or Pope or...
We've had loads of injuries to key players and loads of games, and no gimmes in the cup competitions either. We've been without squad players who could bear some of the load for the key players that remained. But it is what it is, bad luck and you can't blame anyone for that. If they were all soft tissue injuries you could criticise the way we play, or train. But it's things like spinal fractures, or dislocated shoulders, or whatever. You can't account for that beyond having depth, and we don't have depth.
For me I think Howe is a very good manager, however, I think, like Woolwich last year, you got lucky in that Spurs, Chelsea and Liverpool (2nd, 3rd and 4th in number of players mins played at a World Cup scheduled bang slap in the middle of an active season) had their worst season in over a decade simultaneously. I maintain that this season is the time to measure just how good Howe is. And to be honest, I struggling, I'm in two camps 1) I really like how he's got your philosophy across and that despite the injuries the team put out plays the same way is also quite good 2) but then I do have to question why he hasn't changed/rotated even just a couple of positions rather than play the same team twice a week. Safe to say that I don't think I can answer this until the end of the season.
I too have to question why, when we're so stretched we've kept playing that high intensity, or when the players are clearly blowing out their arse we
haven't brought on a kid. If nothing else he'd have fresh legs. I don't think you can judge Howe solely on this season because he's not had the opportunity to play his best squad and we've been unlucky with who've we've been drawn against. Look, we're still seeing players improve under Howe and we're still 7th in the League, in the 1/4 final of the League Cup, still in the FA Cup. He might not be the manager to consistently deliver Champions League, or whatever, but he's got way too much cache for me to lose faith in him because we failed to progress from the Group of Death in our first campaign in the CL for 20yrs.
For you lot not being in Europe is fantastic because it was your golden ticket to get your revenues up and thus make you FFP compliant, so anything that limits your ability to bring in revenues is fantastic for the game. Remember our chat on how dodgy your sponsorship valuations were, Let's see this play out to full effect, most normal deals will see the sponsor pay less if their club fails to qualify for the group stages or fail to qualify for Europe altogether, do you honestly see your PIF Shirt sponsors pay 50% of the £25m pa for crashing out of Europe (or not qualifying at all)??? You and I both know this will not happen!
Do I think Sela will change the terms of the existing contract because we dropped out of the Champions League? No... no I don't I don't think TeamViewer will do that with Man Utd either. Could there be a stipulation that should we fail to qualify for 24/25 we'll get less? maybe, dunno. I'd be surprised if there was because it isn't a contract with a club who regularly qualify for the competition.
Would West Ham's shirt sponsor reduce their deal if they fail to make Europe? Would Brighton?