Burnley (a) 18/19 ratings

  • The Fighting Cock is a forum for fans of Tottenham Hotspur Football Club. Here you can discuss Spurs latest matches, our squad, tactics and any transfer news surrounding the club. Registration gives you access to all our forums (including 'Off Topic' discussion) and removes most of the adverts (you can remove them all via an account upgrade). You're here now, you might as well...

    Get involved!

Latest Spurs videos from Sky Sports

Shittest MOTM


  • Total voters
    37
We were simply out fought by a Burnley team who wanted it more than we did.,The second goal was a clear example of that. WTF were Aurier and Vertonghen doing ? I agree that Sissoko was woeful. Aurier was even worse. Terrible signing. Eriksen may have had a good pass completion percentage but what did he create ? Son looked lost stuck out on the left after being the main man while Kane was out. Remember his great goal v Chelsea ? From the right not left. To me he always looks better cutting in from the right . And who would you rather have on the pitch when we’re going for a late goal- Son or Llorente ? Foyth looked shaky throughout. Maybe he could do a job at RB.
Credit to Winks and intermittently Kane . Nobody else really.
 
Well this is a surprise, you're normally such a fan.

If you did have a pub, it would only serve piss poor beer like Carlsberg, have no BT or SKY sports, the pool table would lean to one side, the darts would have no flights and the only food you'd serve would be out of date cheese and onion crisps.

And the strippers would have forgotten how to undo their bras

ps Mensa would have to demonstrate!!
 
Apart from goals, assists, being our highest chance creator, averaging 50 passes a game he's doing fuck all for us.

Source please.....I just posted in the Eriksen thread with a link, showing that Kane and Son produce more.
50 passes a game, yet just 1.9 key passes per game....the vast majority simple lay offs in the middle of the pitch

You keep, trying to skew the stats in his favour. If you truly believed in his contribution, you wouldnt need to do that

In comparison, Sissoko (who you think is total shit and a pub footballer) makes 45 passes, and 0.9 are key.

So Eriksen stats hardly bathe him in glory.
 
Can’t believe we’r running a thread on who was the worst player, even the manager gets a vote...what makes this game so special to warrant such blame directed at any individual? It’s a fucking team game, like it or not the players on that list are part of our squad, it’s what we have, and people need to accept it, these are the same players that have us sitting 3rd in the league and 90mins from the CL quarter finals with a 3 goal lead in our favor, yet indirectly we are now being asked to vote for the person who has fucked up our season.....Woolwich fan TV wouldn’t have a look in.....COYS!!
Go to every one of these threads and you will notice a confirmation bias with the same players so strong with the author I don't even bother reading what has been posted, not even a word. It's well worth spending the 10-15mins to save you the time in the long run, much better reading the posts that follow and click the vote.
 
Everyone was shite, except maybe the 2 Harrys.

Can someone explain to me how our 3 CBs made so many weak headers all game.

The ball is in the air, they go to head it and it either goes sideways, like they have head like a 50p piece or it drops 5yds in front of them to one of their lot.

Toby is a liability at corners, no centre half gets constantly stuck below the ball like he does. Say what you like about Foyth losing Wood, if Toby could get off the ground he would have headed the ball away before it got to their player.

But then as this board has pointed out to me, we apparently don't have a weakness defending corners.
 
You read off lots of stats, but never link your source
1349865848-methsbottle-5-jpg.45621
 
Good one, see what you did there.

Your the one that makes stuff up, like you know our opponents tactics every week.

Your the one who posted a stats bomb graphic for 8 games which showed more heat down out right and claimed it proved Trippier was targeted, then got shown up when it was pointed out to you that he only played ; of those games, and the same heat map over 38 games showed we were attacked down our left.

Every genuine stat that proves Trippier does good stuff “doesn’t count” and apparently assists are the stupidest stat ever, until you want to use them for Aurier in the CL.

You post a disingenuous token praise of Trippier and then spend 99pc of the time calling him “shit”, “the worst Spurs player for decades” and our weakest link and a player who is the constant target of opponents.

Forgive me if I don’t buy your bullshit “but but I’m so fair” bollocks.

You’re
 
You really want to compare Eriksen with Sissoko? Great idea, they are both AM's converted to predominantly playing CM/8's this season, either side of Winks.

You do realise that 1.9 is more than double the rate of Sissoko's 0.9? And as well as Eriksen getting through more ball than Sissoko too (50-45), he also has 14 goal/assists and Sissoko has....2. Eriksen even tackles the same (1.2) per game that Sissoko does.

Even if you delve a little deeper and look at pressure events (Statsbomb metrics for measuring the defensive work like pressing the ball - not just tackles etc) - Eriksen averages 22 pressure events per game, Sissoko's 13 per game, pressure regains Eriksen 4.7 to Sissoko's 2.7.

It's just an embarrassing comparison in every way. Eriksen would probably be better in goal in than Sissoko.

The fact you are trying to claim Eriksen and Sissoko play the same role says everything.
The fact you tried to say Eriksen is the most productive in the team (when he's thrid) and one of the most in the PL (when he's 11th) speaks volumes.
The fact you call a comparison with Sissoko embarrassing in every way, after doing a detailed comparison shows how desperate you are to prove Eriksens form.

However, if Sissoko is a pub player, he's a little too close to Eriksens stats wouldnt you say....I mean he's "even got the same amount of tackles". You're the one claiming they play the same role, yet you try and make that stat a negative on Sissoko. How so? Eriksen doesnt make more tackles than a pub player, "playing the same position"....you're all over the gaff.

I watch games with my eyes. The stats that matter, are goals, assists, and contribution to team goals etc etc (for an attacker)
Pressure regain isnt a thing. Pressure events dont exist. Its a made up load of bollocks to try and make "jockying" sound uber technical.
Why isnt there a "stat bomb" for meaningless sideways passes and killing counter attacks? Im sure Eriksen would be way ahead there too.
 
Well this is a surprise, you're normally such a fan.

If you did have a pub, it would only serve piss poor beer like Carlsberg, have no BT or SKY sports, the pool table would lean to one side, the darts would have no flights and the only food you'd serve would be out of date cheese and onion crisps.

That sounds like the perfect boozer to me?
 
Gimme Shelter .
It had to happen, we have been lucky recently , pulling it out of bag when we could have dropped points. Dortmund 2nd half has been our only outstanding performance for some time.
Lioris , 6
Rose , spirited but as usual final delivery in row z. 4
Toby , Jan , not at their best 5.
Foryth , at least a year away off becoming a regular. Lightweight constanly bullied , needs a stone of upper body strength .4
Aurier, my God what have we done to deserve him. 90% shit games , cant beat a man , plays balls back breaking any attacking impetus . KWP must start as he's our only half decent option. 2
Sissoko central midfield is very weak 4
Winks , sideways central . Tidy but uninspiring . A mistake to be taken off but Poch has so little to choose of quality in this position. 5
Eriksen , insipid 4.
Son , did absolutely nothing 3.
Kane , effort , very little to feed off but a good goal. 6

Poch out thought , tatically wrong, team selection not the best to compete with a heavyweight static Burnley , 3.
 
Lloris - 5 - had nothing to do except pick the ball out of the net twice
Aurier - 4 - typical daft performance
Alderweireld - 5 - neither good nor bad
Vertonghen - 4 - lost his man for the winning goal
Foyth - 4 - always trying to play but very raw still
Rose - 4 - one good throw in, not one decent cross
Winks - 6 - kept things moving, we couldn’t play football after he went off
Sissoko - 4 - limitations exposed when there is little space/high pressure
Eriksen - 3 - I don’t think he left the dressing room
Son - 5 - looked lively when he got on the ball, which wasn’t often
Kane - 6 - scored a goal and looked dangerous

Subs
Llorente - 3 - all he did was foul
Lamela - 4 - should have scored easy header at the end
Lucas - 5 - no time to have an impact
 
Na I just think it's pretty poor that you're making this thread and leaving other fans to go along with your beliefs. If you're going to do one based on ratings, the bias should be kept at a minimum. Leaving people to vote on the shittest based on how you see it I don't really think it's on mate.

We're having a great season, against all odds and I personally think badmouthing the boys efforts doesn't donthe club any good. Just my opinion on the matter.

I won't be voting, I don't think it's on and it don't feel right as a supporter of the club. Just don't think it's on taking the piss out of them, its demeaning to the efforts of all involved & something I'd expect from someone who supports one of the other London clubs in our direction


Well said Sir
 
This Shit Game we call Football

What a fucking utter pile of wank that was. That's up there with the worst games we've played under Poch. In the last three weeks we've probably played 45 minutes of decent football out of 270, the second half against Dortmund being the bacon, sandwiched between the two thick cut slices of dog shit that were Leicester and Burnley.

I didn't like the 3412 format that Poch started with, it's one CB too many and one central striker too many, leaving us desperately short of quality control in the middle of the pitch. And with Eriksen in the 10 role, he, Son and Kane were all funnelled into a very narrow congested channel. The attacking width that Rose and Aurier were supposed to provide barely materialised, and Winks struggled to play midfield all on his own as Sissoko trundled around like a baby rhino on a smack enema.

How the fuck Pochettino keeps picking Sissoko is anybodies guess. Such a terrible footballer, several times today just flapped the ball away under pressure. Today Winks was on the pitch 34 fucking minutes less than Sissoko and still managed to make 12 more passes. In 94 minutes Sissoko attempted 33 passes and managed to give 8 of them away. Second half he made 9 fucking passes. Burnley constantly threatened down our right as the fucking chuckle brothers Aurier and Sissoko played not to me, not to you.

All of the above made Poch's first sub absolutely fucking baffling. Firstly, we weren't struggling to get a foothold in this game because we lacked height in the box, or a third centre forward, we needed more control, more creativity, more craft. We had manage to build a little momentum second half, but Rose, Auier, Sissoko and Son were just bumbling about like silly cunts.

The logical choice would be to take Foyth off, who was not having a great day anyway, and by the second half was pretty moribund, drop Eriksen back, allowing him to play that 8/10 hybrid role where he can find more pockets of space, in the three man midfield type set up we've used mostly this season, and bring someone like Lamela on and go 433, outnumbering their CB's with our FB's still pushed up occupying their FB's. If he really, really had to take a midfielder off, surely take fucking Sissoko off, who was doing fuck all good, not Winks would have been the logical choice. What he did in taking Winks off, was exasperate a deficiency, made things worse not better, now we lost control of the midfield, the game got scrappy and Burnley were looking as likely as we were to get something.

His solution took out the only midfielder we had who was doing anything constructive, turned our only creative hope, Eriksen, into a shit DM just to put another useless body up top who needed to be creating for. Put simply, increased the burden to create and reduced the creative capability. It was fucking piss poor tactically.

It was another 15 minutes before he made the sub he should have made in the first place, but by then things had just got chaotic, and got even more chaotic as Poch kept desperately shoving on attacking bodies, in the end we looked like some grotesque characture of an Ardiles side.

I can't remember two games back to back as poor tactically as the last two league games, since Poch's first season. Burnley have ended up with an x/g of 1.31, ours was 91. Piss poor on both fronts.

Midfield has been our single biggest weak spot for the last 2 years. We watched Dier trundle about for chunks of it, only to be usurped now by the Sissoko aimless trundling of this season. How can he keep picking a player who is so uncomfortable under pressure in midfield, so technically inept, so devoid of game intelligence.

Individual

Lloris - OK

Aurier - Defensively piss poor, offensively inept. Hapless fucking play leading to their winner, could just nod it to Alderweireld, instead ops to kung fu kick it to them and then go awol. Fucking chump. Not helped by Sissoko's incompetence.

Foyth - Poor game. Lost his man at the corner, gave the ball away too much.

Alderweireld - Meh

Vertonghen - Not great, should have done better with the second goal, trying to use his left instead of his right.

Rose - As ever, got forward, but the odd cross he did put in he seemed to aim for the opposite corner flag.

Sissoko - 25 completed passes in 94 minutes. Repeatedly gave the ball away under pressure. Really, really shit game. Turgid. Pub level, and if it was my pub, he wouldn't even make that.

Winks - Struggled on his own in midfield, but was doing more than Sissoko, why he was subbed I have no idea.

Eriksen - Not his greatest day.

Kane - Great goal. worked hard.

Son - fucked about.

Poch - Piss poor.

You read off lots of stats, but never link your source
 
Back
Top Bottom