-
The Fighting Cock is a forum for fans of Tottenham Hotspur Football Club. Here you can discuss Spurs latest matches, our squad, tactics and any transfer news surrounding the club. Registration gives you access to all our forums (including 'Off Topic' discussion) and removes most of the adverts (you can remove them all via an account upgrade). You're here now, you might as well...
Latest Spurs videos from Sky Sports
That’s a different issue. The video is talking sums.
Won’t be blatant interference
Behind the scenes posturing, manoeuvring and influencing
If the govt sacked the head of the fa and put their own guy in. Governments get involved all the time, banning franchising for example
Last edited:
The government want control over football to stop overspending, bankruptcy, loss of jobs, loss of taxes - that's completely at odds with the way City seek to act.....so something has to give
City are happy with the current way of things. Despite their thick fans' cries of "cartel", they are the current cartel. They have voted for every financial restriction in recent years and for good reason; they are terrified of the oblivion that is coming. I don't think people realise the extent they inflated their initial revenues. Like really, the number of companies they set up and the second rate asset management companies they hired to circulate funds. These are people who don't care about rules or ethics. In their lives they are above that.
Last edited:
Because that's how accounting works.
Profits and losses are based off revenues v expenses for the current year.
Retained earnings in theory are the collective profits accumulated over all previous years.
Ok. I can understand that from an accounting point of view, but why would you actually do that and put yourself in the hole with PSR? Surely, instead of banking that money, you'd spend it so that you don't fall foul?
It's one thing to report losses for the tax breaks, but if you end up with fines and possible points deduction, you'd use your banked monies to offset losses surely?
Otherwise know as The If you dont letvus cheat, we will sue you.
Everyone needs money but fuck me pink, just how many are prepared to sell their own values? Never ending line of greedy cunts
Yes you would and the argument could be made that by limiting measurement to 3 years and not taking into account retained profits that PSR actually encourages reckless and unnecessary spending rather than strategic saving.
Hmmm call me cynical but could this be anyway linked to the 115 charges? They're swinging their dicks around showing the PL that this is how they are going to behave going forward. The 19 other PL clubs need to be behind the PL on this 100%.
City need to be sent down to below the conference, stripped of their titles, and made to repay every penny of prize money.
Obviously they will just get a slap on the wrist. If the rest of the prem gave a shit they should just refuse to play against them.
Obviously they will just get a slap on the wrist. If the rest of the prem gave a shit they should just refuse to play against them.
City basically lawyer up in response to any attempt to stop them cheating.
We should be handed the League Cup that occured just after Jose was sacked.
Thank you
paddy spur
.
I managed to read your article before it was moved or deleted. Fascinating (and scary).
Interesting note from it that, under English law, the EPL might run into a statute of limitations of 6 years in trying to punish City.
Plastic Palm Trees
? Any thoughts.
paddy spur
. I managed to read your article before it was moved or deleted. Fascinating (and scary).
Interesting note from it that, under English law, the EPL might run into a statute of limitations of 6 years in trying to punish City.
Plastic Palm Trees
? Any thoughts.
In English law, limitation periods for most types of civil claim are set out in the Limitation Act 1980 (Statute of Limitations is an Americanism).
Whether a claim is time barred depends on what the claim is. For example, a claim alleging breach of contract should ordinarily be commenced within six years of the breach alleged.
In some circumstances, a limitation period may be extended, for example when a claimant could not reasonably have known of the claim until after the ordinary limitation period had expired.
Whether a claim is time barred depends on what the claim is. For example, a claim alleging breach of contract should ordinarily be commenced within six years of the breach alleged.
In some circumstances, a limitation period may be extended, for example when a claimant could not reasonably have known of the claim until after the ordinary limitation period had expired.