England is spoiled for choice though.I think a match winning footballer is a role every team in the world would want.
Good as Madders is, he doesn't score goals like Kane and he doesn't boss the midfield from box to box like Bellingham.
Does putting him in a very free role as a conduit to the attack blunt what makes those players good?
It's possible Mason Mount as a more disciplined workhorse makes the team better, even though swapping him for Maddison would make Spurs much worse.
But it's also possible the defensive attention going to others could open Maddison up to be even more freely creative.
Gary should try both and make a decision.